Received: from christmastree.ebackpqge.com ([5.181.70.104]:57009) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iIe6Q-0000w7-8P for lojban@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 12:28:00 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=vch16; d=ebackpqge.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:To:Subject:From:Message-ID:Content-Type:Date; i=jonathan@ebackpqge.com; bh=rt9ieoyY2Jq13vyDvidDqJby4IM=; b=lzGfCpZGZaYUjitZ2sBRkFRCXCLIHZGlYJnAf2mYS+KtJxX1vhBI/GuKlX4hxD55Vl4Wz9FbhXrY bP0ObPepAI5h3jzVutWQIEhSiDUrFu4NIeJiWZ+AH6IWF6m9hHusmXxVIFkqcf862Ta7ALor0rS6 bhryWc6xEiKBZKlbql8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: jonathan@ebackpqge.com To: lojban@lojban.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?VGFyZ2V0IGlzIG91ciBmYXZvcml0ZSBzdG9yZSB0b28uIEhlcmUncyAxMDAgdG8gc3BlbmQ=?= From: Jonathan Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="---7588278361279324395578====__wtBmLyuFJuRVbu=" Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:31:00 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.4 X-Spam_score_int: 4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes that is right. and i've never been behind that. i've seen that flavor of enlement before in other game communities. it's inevitably the first stage before they go completely to . an idea -- did yo [...] Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL blocklist [URIs: scrippsnationalnews.com] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image -----7588278361279324395578====__wtBmLyuFJuRVbu= Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Yes that is right. and i've never been behind that. i've seen that flavor of enlement before in other game communities. it's inevitably the first stage before they go completely to . an idea -- did you think of getting more substantial artifacts than +2% climbing speed? so i guess getting a couple of boat/hang-glindingiding artifacts that give almost 10% each is no progression. yeah dude definitely. It was the last day that I can remeber from the past 4 days. I knw there was another one but this is probably the one that will be there too. Most of them will be ok if there is enough for them all. I wasnt ready for all this weather but it was still the same for them in the past and it was about the same thing. Btw, I thought you might find this informative. Digital media (http://www.pinalcountyaz.gov/Departments/Library/Pages/digitalbooks.aspx) ** TARGET CUSTOMER FEEDBACK SURVEY ------------------------------------------------------------ It is our absolute pleasure to inform you that you have been selected to take part in this exclusive survey which earns you a preloaded giftcard to Target. Take your survey and claim your card today. -EXPIRES 10-11-2019- Take My Survey (http://www.ebackpqge.com/start.html/GzPI2g) ** ------------------------------------------------------------ * Shipping (https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201118510) * Shipping Times (https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201118530) * Countries (https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201118550) Stay Connected [facebook] [twitter] [youtube] [instagram] http://ww1.ebackpqge.com/main.html/9PV4W797. clang looks more decent at this moment, I wonder if such a construct can even typecheck, more likely it ends up in an infinite tree. bipll Sep 5 at 19:482Your asking if it is legal which says this is a language-lawyer question but several of the answers don't really take that approach ... it is important to get the tags right Shafik Yaghmour Sep 5 at 20:412@ShafikYaghmour Thanks, aded a tag n.m. Sep 5 at 21:121@ArneVogel yes the updated one uses auto& self which eliminates the dangling reference problem. n.m. Sep 6 at 6:291@TheGreatDuck the C++ lambdas are not really theoretical lambda expressions. C++ has built-in recursive types which the original simple typed lambda calculus cannot express, so it can have things isomorphic to a: a->a and other impossible constructs. n.m. Sep 7 at 6:05 __ -----7588278361279324395578====__wtBmLyuFJuRVbu= Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Yes that is right. and i've never been behind that. i've seen that flavor of enlement before in other game communities. it's inevitably the first stage before they go completely to . an idea -- did you think of getting more substantial artifacts than +2% climbing speed? so i guess getting a couple of boat/hang-glindingiding artifacts that give almost 10% each is no progression. yeah dude definitely. It was the last day that I can remeber from the past 4 days. I knw there was another one but this is probably the one that will be there too. Most of them will be ok if there is enough for them all. I wasnt ready for all this weather but it was still the same for them in the past and it was about the same thing. Btw, I thought you might find this informative. Digital media
 

Target Customer Feedback Survey

It is our absolute pleasure to inform you that you have been selected to take part in this exclusive survey which earns you a preloaded giftcard to Target. Take your survey and claim your card today.

-Expires 10-11-2019-

 

Take My Survey
 

 

 
Stay Connected facebook twitter youtube instagram

Lojban just kept on.

clang looks more decent at this moment, I wonder if such a construct can even typecheck, more likely it ends up in an infinite tree. bipll Sep 5 at 19:48 2 Your asking if it is legal which says this is a language-lawyer question but several of the answers don't really take that approach ... it is important to get the tags right Shafik Yaghmour Sep 5 at 20:41 2 @ShafikYaghmour Thanks, aded a tag n.m. Sep 5 at 21:12 1 @ArneVogel yes the updated one uses auto& self which eliminates the dangling reference problem. n.m. Sep 6 at 6:29 1 @TheGreatDuck the C++ lambdas are not really theoretical lambda expressions. C++ has built-in recursive types which the original simple typed lambda calculus cannot express, so it can have things isomorphic to a: a->a and other impossible constructs. n.m. Sep 7 at 6:05
-----7588278361279324395578====__wtBmLyuFJuRVbu=--