Received: from [45.137.68.95] (port=18483 helo=mozart.eleohotel.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCRY1-0008B7-JL for lojban@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:23:09 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=0llxx; d=eleohotel.com; h=To:Subject:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Content-Type:Date; i=homeair.detector@eleohotel.com; bh=s7ZYjzDtKl1xLhxg972sdzzVclo=; b=FHFekuXhQUIhpmAQBEXlSKxhIRK7+WYQ3j0jgEmgcKyFr1eS29wcnHJJhQH6TmcpHIUw5YKT7ea+ VonmbtCsY39+jJpGwWz7C3RnGqV6aYS0L7joV4SrA1HzCs5HpFiIQrG1Pimt6RKTElM1EaNOTdg6 rstdgRAbFYk+t+NlLf8= To: lojban@lojban.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?SW5kb29yIGFpciBpcyAzMHggbW9yZSBwb2xsdXRlZCB0aGFuIG91dGRvb3IgYWlyLg==?= From: HomeAir Detector Reply-To: homeair.detector@eleohotel.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3075351203.WtB7Ng5x.gtMJEU1.3075351203.KgPnAyTu23p@mozart.eleohotel.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="05623103056231030562310304831565077=?" Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:23:12 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ILojban I think we need something like this. Its so dry in the house, I hope someething like this will helpit. they have settled to avoid legal action from that particular moderator. they have not cha [...] Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: airnow.gov] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image --05623103056231030562310304831565077=? Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit ILojban I think we need something like this. Its so dry in the house, I hope someething like this will helpit. they have settled to avoid legal action from that particular moderator. they have not changed their atude, only covered their . they have not even apologized properly. and they just fired two more people without saying why. (respected people, not the ones who fired monica) they ?haven't changed their atude?, you say. but their policy is tolerant, fair, and reasonable! are you saying stackexchange is wrong to ask people in their community to treat others with respect, including correct use of pronouns? are saying that targeted harment is actually ok? the policy is reasonable. the policy is not what they actually do. the policy is only what they say they do. watch what they do, not what they say they do. > the policy is reasonable. i'm glad you agree. > watch what they do, not what they say they do. on the other hand, give them a chance. people and organisations make mistakes. indeed, they had a disagreement with a moderator. but crucially that has now been settled. > the policy is reasonable. so again, give it a chance. even if skeptically about the implementation. the bad stuff they did wasn't even about anything covered in the policy itself. it was about someone who dared to ask a clarifying question about the policy. forcing other people to say certain things (e.g. forcing them to use gender neutral language) should be Indoor air can be a real safety concern. [a1a3]] the red tape, and compete for allocation of production quotas because the government decided how much of each product should be made instead [rp]] http://www.eleohotel.com/lamb-chop/temp 5-in-1 Home Air Quality Monitor Concerned about the quality of the air in your home? Protect yourself with a high-precision air quality monitor that tests for PM2.5 and PM10, CO2, HCHO and TVOC . http://www.eleohotel.com/lamb-chop/temp and show them this somewhat critical cartoon they?ll go right back and reenlist! edit: /s, in case that wasn?t. Plants that Clean the Air (https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2019/cg_7.html) * About AirNow (https://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=topics.about_airnow) * AirNow International (https://airnow.gov/international) * Air Quality Action Days / Alerts (https://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=airnow.actiondays) * AirCompare (http://www.epa.gov/aircompare/) * Air Quality Index (AQI) (https://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=aqibasics.aqi) * AQI Calculator (https://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=airnow.calculator) http://home.eleohotel.com/bob-burgers/episodes this is certainly a tragedy but sadly it will keep happening because some people are just idiots when it comes to gun safety. my dad knew someone who almost. noticeable lag they're taking different approaches. sony is filling their service with a lot of older games. --05623103056231030562310304831565077=? Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 
ILojban I think we need something like this. Its so dry in the house, I hope someething like this will help it. they have settled to avoid legal action from that particular moderator. they have not changed their atude, only covered their . they have not even apologized properly. and they just fired two more people without saying why. (respected people, not the ones who fired monica) they ?haven't changed their atude?, you say. but their policy is tolerant, fair, and reasonable! are you saying stackexchange is wrong to ask people in their community to treat others with respect, including correct use of pronouns? are saying that targeted harment is actually ok? the policy is reasonable. the policy is not what they actually do. the policy is only what they say they do. watch what they do, not what they say they do. > the policy is reasonable. i'm glad you agree. > watch what they do, not what they say they do. on the other hand, give them a chance. people and organisations make mistakes. indeed, they had a disagreement with a moderator. but crucially that has now been settled. > the policy is reasonable. so again, give it a chance. even if skeptically about the implementation. the bad stuff they did wasn't even about anything covered in the policy itself. it was about someone who dared to ask a clarifying question about the policy. forcing other people to say certain things (e.g. forcing them to use gender neutral language) should be
Indoor air can be a real safety concern.
zPo
the red tape, and compete for allocation of production quotas because the government decided how much of each product should be made instead
 
Lojban
 
5-in-1 Home Air Quality Monitor
Concerned about the quality of the air in your home? Protect yourself with a high-precision air quality monitor that tests for PM2.5 and PM10, CO2, HCHO and TVOC .
teg
 
 
 
and show them this somewhat critical cartoon they?ll go right back and reenlist! edit: /s, in case that wasn?t.
 
 
Plants that Clean the Air
 
 
 
 
partners
this is certainly a tragedy but sadly it will keep happening because some people are just idiots when it comes to gun safety. my dad knew someone who almost. noticeable lag they're taking different approaches. sony is filling their service with a lot of older games.
--05623103056231030562310304831565077=?--