Received: from reverb.thesoundmecha.com ([185.184.70.130]:17281) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVdWk-0006H8-7c for lojban@lojban.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 09:01:07 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=592; d=thesoundmecha.com; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:To:Content-Type:Date; i=fever.testing@thesoundmecha.com; bh=yTxB7OaTl7+ohNVedWPd4Y+Pu7E=; b=lgazgK54/j4DgllaVFNnrE7fUQneSG2laa5pHVGy8JR3bhGerFoazeFOhkWk0XejCqPO+36fwnT9 elUNcRTdnpBiohUgBxTUohj7xgLX8s7jWS+PdodYQxPCrvk7C+tbbPl9nJ7oHmqKatGx3Jj0ulFP 8gaqSNEZJ4nOlv7kpKU= From: Fever Testing Subject: Officials urge use of no-contact thermometers Reply-To: fever.testing@thesoundmecha.com Message-ID: <9318276939893226773371.5465699624773324.kfvvXS1ivF.U604xxpCbs7tRqPAK.zQzDZw3UtrAQqm@reverb.thesoundmecha.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="923603638710616735498=?" Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 12:01:06 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.0 X-Spam_score_int: 10 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lojban tell me what you know about htis, I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong! live tv. by definition he?s an oligarch. by definition a is a . but i can certainly use the term as a slur depending on the context. are you really equating the word ?? to ?oligarch?? sounds like the [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: thesoundmecha.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [185.184.70.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.3 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image --923603638710616735498=? Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Lojban tell me what you know about htis, I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong! live tv. by definition he?s an oligarch. by definition a is a . but i can certainly use the term as a slur depending on the context. are you really equating the word ?? to ?oligarch?? sounds like the only thing you?ve really done is put yourself here no i?m not equating and oligarch. i?m trying to explain how the intent of using the word is important. if you can?t see that then there is no good faith in this conversation. can only be a slur if used insultingly. oligarchs meaning is static. for real? i can use any label insultingly. i can use liberal as an insult, i can use centrist as an insult, i can use oligarch as an insult. if you can?t understand this, then that?s fine. best of luck out there. vote bernie. yup it's not a slur if it accurately describes someone. bloomberg is the world's 9th richest person. bloomberg used his and influence to allow him to have a third mayoral term bloomberg used his and influence to have the dnc change the rules so he can play. hes a by the book oligarch agreed, i?m a huge bernie supporter. calling bloomberg an oligarch so casually seems borderline slanderous. if you?re going to call him that you need to be deliberate with explaining why he is one. oligarch (n): a very rich business leader with a great deal of political influence. borderline slanderous? he fits the definition perfectly. thanks for understanding my point of view. a lot of folks in this thread can't understand why we would feel it was slanderous if the shoe fits great headline, bernie hack. /s idk, bloomberg is not as bad as everyone here seems to think. he didn't inherit any wealth, he came from humble beginnings in boston, ** http://www.thesoundmecha.com/cat-treats/fish ------------------------------------------------------------ http://home.thesoundmecha.com/scary-stories/kids ** ------------------------------------------------------------ * Drug Allergies_see_Drug Reactions (https://medlineplus.gov/drugreactions.html) * Drug Errors_see_Medication Errors (https://medlineplus.gov/medicationerrors.html) * Drug Information_see_Medicines (https://medlineplus.gov/medicines.html) ;Over-the-Counter Medicines (https://medlineplus.gov/overthecountermedicines.html) * Drug Interactions_see_Drug Reactions (https://medlineplus.gov/drugreactions.html) * Drug Reactions (https://medlineplus.gov/drugreactions.html) --923603638710616735498=? Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Time Series 1884 to 2019

Lojban tell me what you know about htis, I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong!

live tv. by definition he?s an oligarch. by definition a is a . but i can certainly use the term as a slur depending on the context. are you really equating the word ?? to ?oligarch?? sounds like the only thing you?ve really done is put yourself here no i?m not equating and oligarch. i?m trying to explain how the intent of using the word is important. if you can?t see that then there is no good faith in this conversation. can only be a slur if used insultingly. oligarchs meaning is static. for real? i can use any label insultingly. i can use liberal as an insult, i can use centrist as an insult, i can use oligarch as an insult. if you can?t understand this, then that?s fine. best of luck out there. vote bernie. yup it's not a slur if it accurately describes someone. bloomberg is the world's 9th richest person. bloomberg used his and influence to allow him to have a third mayoral term bloomberg used his and influence to have the dnc change the rules so he can play. hes a by the book oligarch agreed, i?m a huge bernie supporter. calling bloomberg an oligarch so casually seems borderline slanderous. if you?re going to call him that you need to be deliberate with explaining why he is one. oligarch (n): a very rich business leader with a great deal of political influence. borderline slanderous? he fits the definition perfectly. thanks for understanding my point of view. a lot of folks in this thread can't understand why we would feel it was slanderous if the shoe fits great headline, bernie hack. /s idk, bloomberg is not as bad as everyone here seems to think. he didn't inherit any wealth, he came from humble beginnings in boston,

take advantage
take advantage

--923603638710616735498=?--