MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20121105114949.GN407@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <5097960D.8000704@lojban.org>
 <20121105114949.GN407@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:30:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CALBXrCt2HnnMZrw6y9daqK5cbHTXtMe9o=UxEBm=Orub5Kub-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] LLG Annual Meeting - Quorum Call
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

While I am quite responsive to emails that seem to be directed at me,
and I am very positive toward the community and would like to retain
my connections, I'm not active any more, and don't see that changing
in the foreseeable future. Retaining my membership requires nothing
from me, and remaining on the board appears to harm nothing so far as
I can tell, and stepping down requires that I put in the effort to do
so. Therefore, I have seen no reason to step down. But of course I'm
happy to do so if that is my responsibility. Does the board have a
preference about it?

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:49 AM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Bob LeChevalier scripsit:
>
>> Stephen Weeks and Mark Shoulson were also missing last year.  I
>> don't know the status of either, but Mark has sometimes drifted away
>> in the past, and I suspect that he doesn't watch LLG traffic very
>> closely.
>
> Note that he's in New Jersey, which was hard-hit by Sandy.  He may not
> have Internet connectivity.
>
>> I don't think Steven has been at the last several meetings
>> (my last email from him seems to be 2007), and a motion for his
>> removal is in order.
>
> Moved.
>
> --
> John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
> "The exception proves the rule."  Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
> my theory."  Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts
> the rule to the proof."  But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
> exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Llg-members mailing list
> Llg-members@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members