Received: from localhost ([::1]:43842 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TWXl9-0002rw-SJ; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:27:28 -0800 Received: from tene by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TWXl7-0002rr-37 for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:27:25 -0800 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:27:25 -0800 From: Stephen Weeks To: llg-members@lojban.org Message-ID: <20121108192724.GA10667@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <5097960D.8000704@lojban.org> <509ABFD4.5060500@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <509ABFD4.5060500@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Llg-members] LLG Annual Meeting - Quorum Call X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org Not long ago, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG proclaimed... > I recognize that Mark and Pierre have now responded. Jay is no > longer a member, and there is a motion to remove Stephen, from > membership that has been seconded. > > If there is no objection to removal of Stephen by the end of Friday, > that motion will be considered passed. I've paid almost negligible attention to the lojban community over the past few years. As far as I'm aware, there's no value to the LLG or lojban community in my involvement in LLG business. Given the motion to remove me, I didn't bother responding, but that has been pointed out to me as impolite. I'm not aware of any reason I should object to this. If I'm misinformed or underinformed, feel free to advise me differently. _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members