Received: from localhost ([::1]:33051 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <llg-members-bounces@lojban.org>)
	id 1TZTfH-000550-DP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:41:31 -0800
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
 (envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>) id 1TZTfD-00054v-Kw
 for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:41:27 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:41:27 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
Message-ID: <20121116214127.GK25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org
References: <5097960D.8000704@lojban.org>
 <20121105114949.GN407@mercury.ccil.org>
 <CALBXrCt2HnnMZrw6y9daqK5cbHTXtMe9o=UxEBm=Orub5Kub-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121105154210.GD30442@mercury.ccil.org>
 <CACf3dPn5U_Qesh6r7ARZKmznh6XUkyz_tNeTvxTqmwHARfc7GA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACf3dPn5U_Qesh6r7ARZKmznh6XUkyz_tNeTvxTqmwHARfc7GA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] LLG Annual Meeting - Quorum Call
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:03:21PM +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> I think I should make explicit that I remain interested in making a
> "logical language" available to the world, that I am convinced Lojban (in
> any form recognizable as Lojban) is not a viable candidate for being that
> logical language (and ironically I now have a similar vision of Lojban to
> Lojbab's),

I'd be interested in a brief summary of both why you think it's not
viable, and in what way you think that view agrees with Bob's view?

-Robin

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members