Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from )
id 1VlMAw-0005hr-G6
for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:11:50 -0800
Received: from [199.229.249.224] (port=60292 helo=03e3df07.flinraynorama.us)
by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from )
id 1VlMAm-0005gy-0d
for lojban@lojban.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:11:49 -0800
Received: by 03e3df07.9uhufldsy.flinraynorama.us
(amavisd-new, port 9266) with ESMTP id 03SHIEFJE3DFJHTIRQ07;
for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:11:40 -0800
Subject: Get ready for spring cleaning
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
List-Id: 3266
From: "Original Hurricane Mop"
Sender:
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:11:40 -0800
To: lojban@lojban.org
Importance: Normal
Message-ID: <32664365262149326633515312742679@9uhufldsy.flinraynorama.us>
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=Part.435.9608.1385485900"
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Spam_score: 3.0
X-Spam_score_int: 30
X-Spam_bar: +++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop? http://www.flinraynorama.us/3266/153/335/1274/2679.12tt65262149AAF11.php
Unsub- http://www.flinraynorama.us/3266/153/335/1274/2679.12tt65262149AAF12.html
[...]
Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: lojban.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist
[URIs: flinraynorama.us]
0.0 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
------=Part.435.9608.1385485900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?
http://www.flinraynorama.us/3266/153/335/1274/2679.12tt65262149AAF11.php
Unsub- http://www.flinraynorama.us/3266/153/335/1274/2679.12tt65262149AAF12.html
Why do viewers seem to love Duck Dynasty?A&Es hit show, Duck Dynasty,
season finale brought in 10 million viewers last week and other shows
like Storage Wars and Deadliest Catch, prove successful season after season.So
why is it certain reality shows have shown such strong staying power?I
think there are a number of reasons. One of the reasons is
that people are looking for authenticity in the world and what they
see with a Duck Dynasty, like what they see with an American
Pickers, Cake Boss, is that these people when the cameras go off
thats them, said reality show producer Ethan Meyer, He added, They dont
feel like theyre actors, the cameras stop, and they go home and
theyre totally different people. People walk up to them. Theyre very approachable.
Youre like Im already apart of the family. Im already in there.While
celebrity lifestyle expert Dorothy Cascerceri could not pinpoint the rhyme
and reason to Duck Dynastys she said it could be that it
actually teachers the viewers something rather than just entertains them.Its
really hard to say which reality shows are going to pick up
steam and which reality shows get canceled quickly. The reason that people
really love Duck Dynasty is because it really just kind of showcases
a kind of hobby and a kind of living that most people
really dont know very much about. Its almost like Duck Dynasty piques
peoples curiosity and the reason people keep tuning in over and over
is because they want
rnative under
sequestration," Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell wrote in March to governors
in 41 states, explaining that since the payments were issued in the
2013 budget year, the money would be subject to sequestration.Infuriated,
Republicans and Democrats from Capitol Hill to the governor's offices banded
together to fight back, arguing the money was paid to the states
well before the spending reductions went into effect. The governors of Alaska
and Wyoming have flat out refused to send the money back."The frustration
level is off the charts on this," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.,
whose timber-rich state is the top recipient of the Forest Service payments
and stands to lose nearly $3.6 million.Wyden, chairman of the Senate Energy
and Natural Resources Committee, said he and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski,
the panel's top Republican, are working together to "turn this around" so
their states and others are not forced to return any money to
the federal government."This is slap-your-forehead-in-disbelief kind of
stuff," Wyden said.At issue are so-called county payments, a revenue sharing
plan that's existed since President Teddy Roosevelt created the national
forests to protect timber reserves from the cut-and-run logging going on
at the time. For nearly a century, hundreds of counties received a
quarter of the revenue from the timber sold on federal land. The
money is being used for roads, schools and emergency services and is
a welcome a
------=Part.435.9608.1385485900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Hurricane Mop — Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step
Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?
This email was intended for lojban@lojban.org
May 2, 2013: Family and supporters of 18-year-old Abdella Ahmad Tounisi,
including his father, Ahmad Tounisi, left, leave federal court in Chicago.APCHICAGO
Federal prosecutors in Chicago plan to appeal a judge's surprise decision
to release an Illinois teenager charged with seeking to travel abroad and
join an Al Qaeda-linked militant group in Syria.The U.S. Attorney's Office
announced their plan to appeal Thursday afternoon in the case of 18-year-old
Abdella Ahmad Tounisi. Hours earlier, the judge said Tounisi could be released
under home confinement.Judge Daniel Martin stayed his own order for 24 hours
to give prosecutors a chance to appeal. That means Tounisi wasn't immediately
released.Tounisi, an Aurora resident, was arrested at O'Hare International
Airport last month as he allegedly prepared for the first leg of
a trip to join Qaida-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusrah, which is fighting Syrian
President Bashar Assad's regime.In arguing for continued detention, prosecutors
also noted Thursday that Tounisi had allegedly spoken with a friend of
his last year about bombing targets in Chicago. Tounisi is not charged
in that case, though the friend, Adel Daoud, was and is in
jail awaiting trial.After announcing his ruling, the otherwise soft-spoken
U.S. magistrate judge leaned forward on his bench Thursday and raised his
voice, telling the teenager he should take the allegations seriously."This
is no game, Mr. Tounisi. OK?" Judge Martin told hi
detained while trials were pending and
insist that it will withstand court scrutiny. A federal agent convicted
for the first time under the Kansas law could face six months
in prison, though probation would be the presumed sentence."These hard-working
federal employees cannot be forced to choose between the risk of a
criminal prosecution and the continued performance of their federal duties,"
Barry Grissom, the U.S. attorney for Kansas, said in a statement Thursday.But
Kobach called Holder's analysis "simplistic and incorrect" and said the
Kansas law is valid to protect the state's residents against unconstitutional
measures enacted by Congress."We are very, very confident of our position,"
Kobach said in an interview. "The state of Kansas is not in
any way afraid of a legal challenge."The office of Kansas Attorney General
Derek Schmidt has already anticipated a potential legal challenge from the
federal government, and has asked legislators to increase its budget by
$225,000 over the next two years to cover litigation costs.Stoneking said
a dispute could arise after a local gunsmith sells a firearm manufactured
in Kansas to a state resident without complying with federal requirements
for a background check on the buyer or registering the gun. Kobach
agreed."Until that actually happens, there won't be any litigation," Stoneking
said. "The federal government will have to have some way of finding
out."Supporters of the Kansas law have sa
------=Part.435.9608.1385485900--