Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd131-00080N-JY for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:05:43 -0700 Received: from [41.198.226.118] (port=48310 helo=postal02.whenwoven.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd12t-0007xz-Uz for lojban@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:05:42 -0700 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:05:09 -0700 To: From: Regarding Lowering Your Home Payment Reply-to: Message-ID: Subject: Your adjusted payment (HARP Verification) Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.3 X-Spam_score_int: 13 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Your 2014 HARP 2.0Eligibility Verification-- Announced by Obama (Q4 2014) Hello Lojban Verifying your eligibility you could reduce your payment significantly. Your exact monthly savings can be seen: (1 minute check) http://www.whenwoven.com/3.html [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_HEX From: localpart has long hexadecimal sequence 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: whenwoven.com] 1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: whenwoven.com] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS

Your 2014 HARP 2.0Eligibility Verification--
Announced by Obama (Q4 2014)

Hello Lojban

Verifying your eligibility you could reduce your payment significantly.

Your exact monthly savings can be seen: (1 minute check)
http://www.whenwoven.com/3.html

Obama's | HARP 2.0
Current Low Rate: 2.99% Fixed

Note: Our records indicate that you have not checked your eligibility in 2014.

Regards,
U.S. Housing
Loan Officer

2014 USA Home Packer Associates

26 Jennifer Lynne Drive
knoxville, MD

To ensure that you receive emails from us, please add this address to your address book.

You have received this email because you registered an account at Textbroker. To discontinue receiving our newsletter, please click on the following link: unsub1.

This is more of a design question - since IEnumerator

already encapsulates all the necessary information (.Current, .MoveNext()) about something that can be enumerated, then what's the point of introducing a type (IEnumerable) whose sole purpose is to return an instance of the former? To be specific: Why can't foreach be designed to iterate directly through an IEnumerator, like so: // foreach (var e in anEnumerator) { //... } while (anEnumerator.MoveNext()) { doSomething(anEnumerator.Current); } Why can't Linq be built based directly off of IEnumerator?FYI: platform string is important because it helps identifying HW model for programming purpose. Below is my guess: iPhone 6 (GSM): iPhone7,1 iPhone 6 (Global): iPhone7,2 iPhone 6 Plus (GSM): iPhone7,3 iPhone 6 Plus (Global): iPhone7,4