Received: from localhost ([::1]:49982 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8eQb-0006GY-Bh; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:24:49 -0800 Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]:59999) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8eQX-0006GE-FV for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:24:46 -0800 Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f73so165697yha.6 for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:24:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=p2fJZlox7ItBXWkWXvufgkUyU7StOHveB+u7e8jCcOc=; b=zsdwzbvxF8KQZaoS2k7M+A2BwGWS/0civfCV6UQxCPxSB0K4fl/50B/3hMtpVNh2EV Msz7T74txsU3m3N6MV1XvfYJ+WbJ4rMjmY5hfymvf3kH0TqqF4WILsH50uu4PbNX1804 Z87qp0f+z41PWSSv5/VIl2XCZJ3aPczSRc7ubFnejWRfNInzZX2p5I9iPXMg4rfBRq1p XcWPEh8z+YUEMqlfBiOmsgujPy+McczZmC5sZcyxePV/0B9FN3a8Bi6MIgG2SwYt04nd GqU4ZKhSBbC37u7+IUCbdxEvQpEbqBoHXCE0t9Px6XcW1h3VaxaE88x8FFh49R6n2rj9 y3EA== X-Received: by 10.236.40.35 with SMTP id e23mr132322yhb.110.1420590278517; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:24:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54ABA9C1.3080605@lojban.org> <0C5FDF6F-95F8-4012-80ED-DB2834908FC6@gmail.com> <54AC6D35.7020602@lojban.org> From: Craig Daniel Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:24:38 +0000 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] John Cowan X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6947788267211727405==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============6947788267211727405== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113677c8ec2850050c04f278 --001a113677c8ec2850050c04f278 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ooh! How about if we go the opposite way, and decide that henceforth among Lojbanists he shall be known simply as the Grammarian? Just as long as there aren't any Lojban-speaking nihilists. Wouldn't want anybody causing trouble for la bauski. On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 7:13:24 PM Craig Daniel wrote: > Hehe, that'd be kind of awesome really. But we'd need to bestow it in > Lojbanized form. > > On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 6:54:17 PM And Rosta wrote: > >> >> On 6 Jan 2015 23:18, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" < >> lojbab@lojban.org> wrote: >> > But choosing to be serious, the "title" that I occasionally referred to >> you by during your period of activity was in fact our "chief Grammarian", >> so perhaps you would accept "Grammarian" as a title both meaningful and >> well-earned. >> >> Perhaps _Archgrammarian_ (like _archbishop_). Alternatively, _Cowan_ >> could, like _Caesar_, become an honorific title bestowed on sufficiently >> meritorious future grammarians. >> >> --And. >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> > --001a113677c8ec2850050c04f278 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ooh! How about if we go the opposite way, and decide that henceforth among = Lojbanists he shall be known simply as the Grammarian?

Just as = long as there aren't any Lojban-speaking nihilists. Wouldn't want a= nybody causing trouble for la bauski.

O= n Tue Jan 06 2015 at 7:13:24 PM Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hehe, that'd be kind of awesome really. But we'd need= to bestow it in Lojbanized form.

On Tue = Jan 06 2015 at 6:54:17 PM And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:


On 6 Jan 2015 23:18, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG&quo= t; <lojbab@lojban= .org> wrote:
> But choosing to be serious, the "title" that I occasionally = referred to you by during your period of activity was in fact our "chi= ef Grammarian", so perhaps you would accept "Grammarian" as = a title both meaningful and well-earned.

Perhaps _Archgrammarian_ (like _archbishop_). Alternatively,= _Cowan_ could, like _Caesar_, become an honorific title bestowed on suffic= iently meritorious future grammarians.

--And.

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members
--001a113677c8ec2850050c04f278-- --===============6947788267211727405== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============6947788267211727405==--