Received: from localhost ([::1]:50702 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8kpQ-0005Hf-Nk; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:14:52 -0800 Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:49804) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8kpL-0005HY-5F for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:14:51 -0800 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id q58so630848wes.4 for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:14:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IpmXOoguYyBzqzq7ZJJk7CQOZDZM24YawCD2VHufwbA=; b=KuKwAMA3naQVFnsTDtPgZu0udpnef7gVjIuEq4S0aiEkpx86d902CmZZ1ps10bQ32M BYNxBsXv4u3qUa2liw1N8uSnroKM5eKTy3tR5XiLZ8wbyf04CUe+qiREcth3HpmZ6LQD yvrX316bTdqq98srBEtTmmu2FmH1a/evsKVSIuILxGAUGfC52SQ7/Mt91YU1INa7Vjue i0+nbxEVUkSyUIR/H8rYc8d0aH+N1YrulOdsaXu8L/1iHARGTJLhSBpmOi+Bzmf9x6yd e4boxly5AM1BEW+n4zd4SHi7y5+7HXhrigEr89xWQPlm3Voz99hEXSQ+y0T6BSCO4AKD Tltw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.63.169 with SMTP id h9mr3001149wjs.23.1420614880276; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.79.102 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:14:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3218709.0yFXkySOok@caracal> References: <54ABA9C1.3080605@lojban.org> <0C5FDF6F-95F8-4012-80ED-DB2834908FC6@gmail.com> <2124d3cb00af8164fbba775639b94926.squirrel@www.ccil.org> <3218709.0yFXkySOok@caracal> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:14:40 +0500 Message-ID: From: Ali Sajid Imami To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.7 X-Spam_score_int: 7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I second Archgrammarian/balenpre. Regards, Ali Sajid Imami CTO Khabaristan Times On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ali.sajid.imami[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid Subject: Re: [Llg-members] John Cowan X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7731323224651320958==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7731323224651320958== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba97a864d35c8050c0aad16 --047d7ba97a864d35c8050c0aad16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I second Archgrammarian/balenpre. Regards, Ali Sajid Imami CTO Khabaristan Times On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 10:55:27 cowan@ccil.org wrote: > > I don't at all consider myself a founder or Founder, and wouldn't care > > for that title very much. > > Well I wouldn't consider you a loster. > > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 18:18:13 Bob LeChevalier, President and > Founder - > LLG wrote: > > You weren't really a "founder" but rather first-among-equals in the > > second "wave" - second foundationer: maybe Preem Palver is the proper > > title. > > palver ki'a? > > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 23:54:03 And Rosta wrote: > > Perhaps _Archgrammarian_ (like _archbishop_). Alternatively, _Cowan_ > could, > > like _Caesar_, become an honorific title bestowed on sufficiently > > meritorious future grammarians. > > A cowan is someone who tries to learn a trade without being initiated int= o > the > guild of that trade, or as used by Freemasons, one who tries to learn abo= ut > Masonry without being an accepted Mason. Is that appropriate? > > I think "Archgrammarian" is a good one. Should we say "balgenpre" in > Lojban? > > Pierre > -- > La sal en el mar es m=C3=A1s que en la sangre. > Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang. > > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --047d7ba97a864d35c8050c0aad16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I second Archgrammarian/balenpre.



Regards,Ali Sajid Imami
CTO

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Pierre Abba= t <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 10:55:27 cowan@ccil.org wrote:
> I don't at all consider myself a founder or Founder, and wouldn= 9;t care
> for that title very much.

Well I wouldn't consider you a loster.

On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 18:18:13 Bob LeChevalier, President and Founde= r -
LLG wrote:
> You weren't really a "founder" but rather first-among-eq= uals in the
> second "wave" - second foundationer: maybe=C2=A0 Preem Palve= r is the proper
> title.

palver ki'a?

On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 23:54:03 And Rosta wrote:
> Perhaps _Archgrammarian_ (like _archbishop_). Alternatively, _Cowan_ c= ould,
> like _Caesar_, become an honorific title bestowed on sufficiently
> meritorious future grammarians.

A cowan is someone who tries to learn a trade without being initiate= d into the
guild of that trade, or as used by Freemasons, one who tries to learn about=
Masonry without being an accepted Mason. Is that appropriate?

I think "Archgrammarian" is a good one. Should we say "balge= npre" in Lojban?

Pierre
--
La sal en el mar es m=C3=A1s que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

--047d7ba97a864d35c8050c0aad16-- --===============7731323224651320958== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7731323224651320958==--