Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Riley Martinez-Lynch <shunpiker@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54B13D7A.4040305@lojban.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:06:00 -0500
Message-Id: <350633AF-6CC0-498A-BFF9-E2AAF5CB0300@gmail.com>
References: <54B13D7A.4040305@lojban.org>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: 0.7
X-Spam_score_int: 7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
 running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", 
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: I also understand the proposals to convert the title to
 "Archgrammarian"
 / {balgenpre} as friendly amendments. --Riley On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:55 AM,
 "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" wrote: [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (0.7 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
 [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN] [A]
 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
 See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
 for more information. [URIs: lojban.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.192.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (shunpiker[at]gmail.com)
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: John Cowan "balgenpre"
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org


I also understand the proposals to convert the title to "Archgrammarian" / {balgenpre} as friendly amendments.

--Riley

On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:55 AM, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

> Riley proposed the following motion:
>> I would like to move that John Cowan be awarded a permanent honorary
>> position like that bestowed on the Founders at the 2003 Annual Meeting,
>> including the authorization to sign official LLG communication channels
>> using the given title, but not including voting privileges or
>> representational authority. If the Founders who are also members (Bob
>> LeChevalier, Nora LeChevalier, and Tommy Whitlock) do not object, John
>> could also be acknowledged as a Founder.
> 
> 
> John Cowan appeared to object to "Founder", and in any event, I saw no second.
> 
> And suggested "Archgrammarian", which Pierre Lojbanized as "balgenpre".
> 
> Ali understood all this to be part of a motion and seconded it with Archgrammarian/balgenpre.  I am ruling that these alternatives are intended as friendly amendments to Riley's motion, which has been seconded as amended.  If Riley were to object, someone would need to independently repropose the motion.
> 
> Since this is intended as an honorary title, it is necessary that John Cowan positively indicate that it is acceptable.
> 
> Assuming that John so indicates, I allow 3 days for objection, until the end of day on 13 January UT, at which point the amended motion will be adopted.
> 
> lojbab
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Llg-members mailing list
> Llg-members@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members