Received: from localhost ([::1]:60587 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YA7YT-0007qk-0I; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:43:01 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net ([68.230.241.217]:37806) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YA7YQ-0007qd-4F for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:42:58 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo110 ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150111014251.BFZQ26047.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo110> for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:42:51 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo110 with cox id eRir1p00N1LDWBL01Rirx4; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:42:51 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.54B1D51B.012C,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=GKHW5JxK c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=vKzndnNFKpQA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=0vWZxY5WU53HhpYMOrMA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <54B1D51C.4070908@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:42:52 -0500 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <54B146BE.3030503@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On 1/10/2015 4:51 PM, Matt Arnold wrote: > > Could someone make a motion indicating >> 1) a vote of confidence in Robin's decision-making with respect to the process of CLL republication (CLL 1.1), including those items that he asked about >> 2) authorizing expenditures up to some maximum by Robin or his delegatees for such republication, without need for approval of each such expenditure, up to some >> specified limit (I suggest $1000 to $2000 based on Robin's report), with a final report of such expenditures submitted to the Board. > > I so move. -Eppcott [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in lojban.org.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [68.230.241.217 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [Llg-members] CLL republication - continuation of the meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 1/10/2015 4:51 PM, Matt Arnold wrote: > > Could someone make a motion indicating >> 1) a vote of confidence in Robin's decision-making with respect to the process of CLL republication (CLL 1.1), including those items that he asked about >> 2) authorizing expenditures up to some maximum by Robin or his delegatees for such republication, without need for approval of each such expenditure, up to some >> specified limit (I suggest $1000 to $2000 based on Robin's report), with a final report of such expenditures submitted to the Board. > > I so move. -Eppcott Please specify an amount for the limit. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members