Received: from localhost ([::1]:47786 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YN5nN-0001KC-3g; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:28:01 -0800 Received: from static.217.217.251.148.clients.your-server.de ([148.251.217.217]:53604 helo=cracksucht.de) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YN5nG-0001K4-0W for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:27:59 -0800 Message-ID: <54E10141.1000202@selpahi.de> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:27:45 +0100 From: selpahi To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <54D471BB.2070605@lojban.org> <54D66BA8.5040607@lojban.org> <08041A2E-FC72-4E80-AAB4-468A1A3C4DB4@gmail.com> <54DA533B.2090803@lojban.org> <54DD2B86.2020506@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org I agree that the chair shouldn't be the one appointing members. Similarly, we don't want LLG to appoint the chair every year, but we (the LLG) have to pick a chair for the first year to get things started. So what if we did the same for the initial set of BPFK members? Let everyone who wants to be a member say so now, and then the LLG membership will hold a vote of confidence to approve that initial set of members. And from then on, it's up to the BPFK membership (including the chair) to decide how it wants to run things. This seems like a simple solution to me. mi'e la selpa'i mu'o _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members