Received: from localhost ([::1]:33935 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YOth8-00058N-HS; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:57:02 -0800 Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:41445) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YOth2-000588-OP for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:57:01 -0800 Received: by yhaf10 with SMTP id f10so4737091yha.8 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:56:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=DhTL2P9cldoFuc/7C1pFdeSU8+w/nXz5dAms/nsX278=; b=X7HRVQQHu3TBrwFwaJqCJxJ/IRMgZ6Z20+GHT+3nq9qp76/zwMd85+/TRsX2nSMjG9 gfxlknkWci1lxzGN0iG1q3BZR7tjlAVkQ/4N7y8cFJT9lG5y6g6cMe7XZ3kTY130IcYo RqN2kabKOiz86JGmP1kPEc99l3Y2IZzi2WCOqp9cFUL2R8YtEepbDWC9IFuqAgAsqQX2 6cQAxwN6LahcI0iVSmTIWGCqIe9yaYWm8E+QbGEaTjgyYf0xbYEQLWmvFEb2FwMYEjBZ SV4jMvtom4X2od5afPgR8lA4NZOIvfxaiNnnrNcWZ8BTZe6G/DjUSUP7HONCrR5sszC9 Cq/Q== X-Received: by 10.236.109.137 with SMTP id s9mr8180641yhg.120.1424462210174; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:56:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> <54E4B13E.5090904@lojban.org> <54E64FCE.3040102@lojban.org> <4C637862-6253-4FAF-A688-CC25B93391A0@gmail.com> <54E73D34.7030201@gmail.com> From: Craig Daniel Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:56:49 +0000 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] BPFK Reauthorization Vote X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1996957470348531356==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============1996957470348531356== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2bbae0896a1050f8a746f --001a11c2bbae0896a1050f8a746f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable .ie mi sarji - mi'e .kreig. On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 12:26:17 PM Adam Lopresto wrote: > .i'e > > Aye. > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Ilmen wrote: > >> I hereby vote in favor of this motion. >> >> mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o >> >> =E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94 >> >> >> On 20/02/2015 14:10, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: >> >> Okay, others reminded me that it's highly recommended to vote since this >> is the nature of LLG so I have read the proposal more carefully. >> >> Here is the latest version of mukti's proposal: >> http://vrici.lojban.org/~mukti/bpfk-reauthorization.txt >> >> I vote "aye". >> >> I suggest other members become more active too. >> >> >> >> 2015-02-20 8:17 GMT+03:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch : >> >>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>> > The motion has been moved and seconded, and there has been lots of >>> time for discussion, so I call on all members to vote on the question >>> >>> >>> I vote {ie}. >>> >>> --Riley >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --001a11c2bbae0896a1050f8a746f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
.ie mi sarji

=C2=A0- mi'e .kreig.

On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 12:26:17 PM Adam Lo= presto <adamlopresto@gmail.com= > wrote:
.i'e=

Aye.


On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:57 A= M, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
I hereby vote in favor of this motion.

mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o

=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94=E2=80=94


On 20/02/2015 14:10, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
Okay, others reminded me that it's highly recommended to vote since this is the nature of LLG so I have read the proposal more carefully.

Here is the latest version of mukti's proposal:

I suggest other members become more active too.



2015-02-20 8:17 GMT+03:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch <shunpiker@gmail.com>:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> The motion has been moved and seconded, and there has been lots of time for discussion, so I call on all members to vote on the question


I vote {ie}.

--Riley
_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg= -members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members<= br>




_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members
--001a11c2bbae0896a1050f8a746f-- --===============1996957470348531356== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============1996957470348531356==--