Received: from localhost ([::1]:44735 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YWGaf-0002Rc-28; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:49 -0700 Received: from mail-yh0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:44501) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YWGaX-0002RS-Tp for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:46 -0700 Received: by yhzz6 with SMTP id z6so10514373yhz.11 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Q0KeMVnXClENsVgbmvKYYgNx2f29Q5h55kWpp+1C0zg=; b=P72W9knSQZbazZiK//WeA30zqgYpBjIchL01ydTF8+ucZr9x6P5Le3Gh4X3b5rJ8Hc k1uQ6DUgJND70KHeSr23MSxlNPngjVpdDzL+wvI6Tb/jnuPW/wzkWQOh0v3JV2YAkIkI l83RJkB4iT0EAxZHJnfTDpIf6BJSgD9gZsJSHDm1ba+z/gQ5CyfT3dsUUCNXxFGSuLXy CRUnhI5OfUvHK13Mg8ab7wDwM6hRkZth2D78Leho62Ld83+dqItEUf8MEQ74IN4XdDz5 YCMH4XLSTp5DAtxuGxLUxFYS2lLi0tP04VCEQD2x6UVEbMxxzJOMZTgct/1ntKaUTepJ 3Cag== X-Received: by 10.236.31.229 with SMTP id m65mr45076408yha.173.1426218515516; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:48:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <550227B2.1030304@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: <550227B2.1030304@lojban.org> From: Craig Daniel Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 03:48:34 +0000 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Old Business: Riley's motion X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1802071949404557046==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============1802071949404557046== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01634cf0fd55d40511235f37 --089e01634cf0fd55d40511235f37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I second. - Craig Daniel On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:56 PM Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > I did not notice any other Old Business being raised in reviewing the > last couple weeks of traffic, but Riley reminded me that he had posted > this. If I missed anything raised by someone else, please speak up again. > > I will take the following to be moved. > >> As for other old business, if presiding officer recognizes it as such, > >> I would like to ask the membership to approve or amend this presentation > >> of the bylaws, which includes a number of amendments which were passed > >> at the 2003 Annual Meeting, but which -- as far as I can tell -- were > >> never integrated into the public text: > >> > >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+ > Language+Group%2C+Inc.+%282014%29 > >> Language+Group,+Inc.+%282014%29> > >> > >> > >> As much as possible, I used the text of the minutes of the 2003 Annual > >> Meeting (http://www.lojban.org/tiki/LLG+2003+Annual+Meeting+Minutes) to > >> reconstruct the necessary changes. I also sought clarification on the > >> mriste (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE > >> ), and > >> lojbab responded on several points. The changes to the bylaws, relative > >> to the previously published version, are recorded in footnotes 12-16. > >> > >> To be clear: I am not seeking any new changes in the bylaws. I just want > >> to confirm that this is an accurate reflection of the amendments which > >> were passed in 2003, and that this version can be therefore considered > >> to reflect the actual bylaws of the organization. > >> > >> --Riley Martinez-Lynch > > If someone will second this, then I will allow 3 days for an objection > or discussion, after which the motion will be considered adopted without > objection. > > If no other old business has been raised by then, I will consider Old > Business to be closed. > > lojbab > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --089e01634cf0fd55d40511235f37 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I second.

=C2=A0- Craig Daniel

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:56 PM Bob LeChevalier, President= and Founder - LLG <lojbab@lojban.o= rg> wrote:
I did not notice any ot= her Old Business being raised in reviewing the
last couple weeks of traffic, but Riley reminded me that he had posted
this.=C2=A0 If I missed anything raised by someone else, please speak up ag= ain.

I will take the following to be moved.
>> As for other old business, if presiding officer recognizes it as s= uch,
>> I would like to ask the membership to approve or amend this presen= tation
>> of the bylaws, which includes a number of amendments which were pa= ssed
>> at the 2003 Annual Meeting, but which -- as far as I can tell -- w= ere
>> never integrated into the public text:
>>
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://ww= w.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Language+Group%2C+Inc= .+%282014%29
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<http://= www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Language+Group,+Inc= .+%282014%29>
>>
>>
>> As much as possible, I used the text of the minutes of the 2003 An= nual
>> Meeting (http://www.lojban.org/tiki/LLG+2003+= Annual+Meeting+Minutes) to
>> reconstruct the necessary changes. I also sought clarification on = the
>> mriste (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!top= ic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21top= ic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE>), and
>> lojbab responded on several points. The changes to the bylaws, rel= ative
>> to the previously published version, are recorded in footnotes 12-= 16.
>>
>> To be clear: I am not seeking any new changes in the bylaws. I jus= t want
>> to confirm that this is an accurate reflection of the amendments w= hich
>> were passed in 2003, and that this version can be therefore consid= ered
>> to reflect the actual bylaws of the organization.
>>
>> --Riley Martinez-Lynch

If someone will second this, then I will allow 3 days for an objection
or discussion, after which the motion will be considered adopted without objection.

If no other old business has been raised by then, I will consider Old
Business to be closed.

lojbab

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members
--089e01634cf0fd55d40511235f37-- --===============1802071949404557046== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============1802071949404557046==--