Received: from localhost ([::1]:50805 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YXFMP-0002ew-BJ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:42:09 -0700 Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:35734) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YXFMJ-0002en-7X for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:42:07 -0700 Received: by qgez64 with SMTP id z64so25613903qge.2 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:41:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type; bh=glGUSiKQiGwhXKH0Jwconvgxya6EfI6bAp4DeOL0674=; b=h2MhIAXpQWNzWBMzdl1nMR1bJrsp1UhIiZiGbhDRr2I5qnD2bwU8JxRoVVdkrGvEcf aUoaJwkGhk5gCC+XAgWZCrexjJPnI2vhzpMOsj83E/wyph9lq+m3sjjmy5IjNkTLxGUW sB1KdwSvoC5ip8SJa2ATxhtTt20fwTsp2U8iy0RTw3Cm+EonH+RpFuKzQZigdIBgWV5f RZvVvHLItjA1uXXZSBh9VJWQ8xsqHO83C7+uJfbEX6Hfw6jHl5lQ0bt15cT/2RuPbezI jDy/U/9ocqmVQ2/wmpDBZsk5EzQGtm+yKYU2Zu1dT4AOjgerDHNQUfNGh0Pki+qIq/0F 2UXg== X-Received: by 10.140.40.203 with SMTP id x69mr70288571qgx.15.1426452116951; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.223] ([172.56.22.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e73sm6064881qkh.19.2015.03.15.13.41.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:41:53 -0400 From: Alex Burka To: llg-members@lojban.org Message-ID: <40E57560C68D4A19B401ED86AA531A82@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <550227B2.1030304@lojban.org> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Old Business: Riley's motion X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2965396603102646961==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============2965396603102646961== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5505ee91_7fbef251_214" --5505ee91_7fbef251_214 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Looks good to me. Thanks for pulling this together, Riley. On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > I second too. > > 2015-03-13 6:48 GMT+03:00 Craig Daniel : > > I second. > > > > - Craig Daniel > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:56 PM Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > > > I did not notice any other Old Business being raised in reviewing the > > > last couple weeks of traffic, but Riley reminded me that he had posted > > > this. If I missed anything raised by someone else, please speak up again. > > > > > > I will take the following to be moved. > > > >> As for other old business, if presiding officer recognizes it as such, > > > >> I would like to ask the membership to approve or amend this presentation > > > >> of the bylaws, which includes a number of amendments which were passed > > > >> at the 2003 Annual Meeting, but which -- as far as I can tell -- were > > > >> never integrated into the public text: > > > >> > > > >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Language+Group%2C+Inc.+%282014%29 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> As much as possible, I used the text of the minutes of the 2003 Annual > > > >> Meeting (http://www.lojban.org/tiki/LLG+2003+Annual+Meeting+Minutes) to > > > >> reconstruct the necessary changes. I also sought clarification on the > > > >> mriste (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lojban/7IS0b62FKhE > > > >> ), and > > > >> lojbab responded on several points. The changes to the bylaws, relative > > > >> to the previously published version, are recorded in footnotes 12-16. > > > >> > > > >> To be clear: I am not seeking any new changes in the bylaws. I just want > > > >> to confirm that this is an accurate reflection of the amendments which > > > >> were passed in 2003, and that this version can be therefore considered > > > >> to reflect the actual bylaws of the organization. > > > >> > > > >> --Riley Martinez-Lynch > > > > > > If someone will second this, then I will allow 3 days for an objection > > > or discussion, after which the motion will be considered adopted without > > > objection. > > > > > > If no other old business has been raised by then, I will consider Old > > > Business to be closed. > > > > > > lojbab > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Llg-members mailing list > > > Llg-members@lojban.org (mailto:Llg-members@lojban.org) > > > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Llg-members mailing list > > Llg-members@lojban.org (mailto:Llg-members@lojban.org) > > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org (mailto:Llg-members@lojban.org) > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --5505ee91_7fbef251_214 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Looks good to me. Thanks for pulling this together, R= iley.
=20

On =46riday, March 13,= 2015 at 1:55 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:

I second too.

2015-03-13 6:48 GMT+03:00 Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel=40gmail.com>:
I second.

 - Craig Daniel

= On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:56 PM Bob LeChevalier, President and =46ounder = - LLG <lojbab=40lojban.org> wrote:
<= div>I did not notice any other Old Business being raised in reviewing the=
last couple weeks of traffic, but Riley reminded me that he had posted this.  If I missed anything raised by someone else, please speak up = again.

I will take the following to be moved.
>> As for other old business, if presiding officer recognizes it as= such,
>> I would like to ask the membership to approve or amend this pres= entation
>> of the bylaws, which includes a number of amendments which were = passed
>> at the 2003 Annual Meeting, but which -- as far as I can tell --= were
>> never integrated into the public text:
>>
>>     http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Langu= age+Group%2C+Inc.+%282014%29
>>     <http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Bylaws+of+The+Logical+Lan= guage+Group,+Inc.+%282014%29>
>>
>>
>> As much as possible, I used the text of the minutes of the 2003 = Annual
>> Meeting (http://www.lojban.org/tiki/LLG+2003+Annual+Meeting+Minutes) to
>> reconstruct the necessary changes. I also sought clarification o= n the
>> mriste (https://groups.google.co= m/forum/=23=21topic/lojban/7IS0b62=46KhE
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/=23%21topic/lojban/7IS0b62=46KhE>), and
>> lojbab responded on several points. The changes to the bylaws, r= elative
>> to the previously published version, are recorded in footnotes 1= 2-16.
>>
>> To be clear: I am not seeking any new changes in the bylaws. I j= ust want
>> to confirm that this is an accurate reflection of the amendments= which
>> were passed in 2003, and that this version can be therefore cons= idered
>> to reflect the actual bylaws of the organization.
>>
>> --Riley Martinez-Lynch

If someone will second this, then I will allow 3 days for an objection or discussion, after which the motion will be considered adopted without<= br> objection.

If no other old business has been raised by then, I will consider Old
= Business to be closed.

lojbab

=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
Llg-members mailing list
L= lg-members=40lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-mem= bers

=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members=40lojban.org<= /a>
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members


 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20

--5505ee91_7fbef251_214-- --===============2965396603102646961== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============2965396603102646961==--