Received: from localhost ([::1]:57472 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YbIkK-00068E-UQ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:07:36 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net ([68.230.241.214]:34968) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YbIkE-00067o-Fa for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:07:35 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo109 ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150327010724.FAFD21735.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo109> for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:07:24 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo109 with cox id 8R7P1q00b1LDWBL01R7Qno; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:07:24 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.5514AD4C.004A,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=EpUMW1gA c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=f3V2rFgbO5kA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=M9eKOHf7nXq4pf-wjuYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <5514AD53.8030509@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:07:31 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <54D471BB.2070605@lojban.org> <54D66BA8.5040607@lojban.org> <08041A2E-FC72-4E80-AAB4-468A1A3C4DB4@gmail.com> <54DA533B.2090803@lojban.org> <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 3/23/2015 6:10 PM, DerSaidin wrote: > 1) To clarify, "the general membership" refers to the members of the LLG, not the members of the BPFK? The meetings mentioned are meetings of the LLG? Yes. > 2) If the BPFK's work must be accepted by the LLG, will the LLG now issue any statements/guidance on what changes it would accept and what changes it would not accept? Only if someone proposes such a statement for voting. None has been suggested to my knowledge. > This would help avoid the possibility of the BPFK doing some work, the LLG rejecting it, and the BPFK loosing enthusiasm and momentum. I hope and believe that the LLG membership as well as the BPFK membership is quite aware of this possibility, so that the BPFK will not propose anything too extreme, and the LLG membership will not reject anything without a really good reason, precisely because we don't want such a loss of momentum or enthusiasm. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members