Received: from localhost ([::1]:57288 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aVMDA-0006h2-JQ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:41:20 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net ([68.230.241.213]:42634) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aVMD4-0006g5-FR for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:41:19 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20160215164108.KQAA10784.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:41:08 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.244.98]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id Jgh81s0062869s801gh8As; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:41:08 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.56C1FFA4.019E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=a87uAzuF c=1 sm=1 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:17 a=0Om7VIW4OcK5grEdB-cA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com> <56C1998B.5050005@lojban.org> <82DDFA36-4BF2-44E7-AF8A-8A810E50EE0A@gmail.com> From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. Message-ID: <56C1FFA4.5020605@lojban.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:41:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] co'a co'u dursipna X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 2/15/2016 9:05 AM, Craig Daniel wrote: > I'm of the impression that And is correct, current members are assumed > to stand again. My intent is NOT to presume that anyone is standing again, unless they explicitly say so. And even that assumption might be wrong. Remember that on the current Board, we have one member, Timo Paulssen who was on the Board, I assumed he was standing again at the start of the Board election - he never removed himself from consideration though he expressed some reluctance when he actually voted and did not vote for himself, but that was on the last day of voting. Then when he was elected, he explicitly refused to be "present" at the Board meeting (but also never explicitly resigned). I certainly don't want to presume that he is standing again, which would be entailed by your assumption. In addition, Ali indicated his presence at start of the Board meeting, but never said anything at the meeting after that - and his proposal for a hired manager was one of the topics that I expected that the Board would discuss during the past year. His energy in organizing the 25th anniversary Logfest from 10000 miles away encouraged me to hope for great things, but after the long silence, I don't think we should assume that he really wants to be on the Board unless he says so. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members