Received: from localhost ([::1]:54651 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aZbNV-0003J8-KH; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:41:33 -0800 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:33913) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aZbNP-0003Hx-Ne for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:41:31 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id p65so2023749wmp.1 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:41:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nwwIH0Xo2RXgqcNECjQA2m73koychi9o/6Iu4JXXooU=; b=w60xSlpkU5VHiGTvsk9FSCDrBhw1CFPW145Y9xc8Ffub56da9W6LErzFjBGEYDSoJd e1f5ZxnKSyKi4I9HY/Q/TLtXSErM1PMZ3wudlB4l54+s7cD1b1SsJ6LCYCz4K7pSNkC0 W1NMiOsRc9esMd/vm7wlmag8i8bGeqUtFWgnOw3bgl7JnHdYWeKRLn3xIB7IL7vgq9L5 qOO1I0fyCOhZJd75DjXydRHpiZJBQbbuxbKvToegXYMtsi2DnI1hs2clE9KAqRKjoDoY UVX4voFAYA4r8/cajn66jJDa7lbQdPBzK2fK2s8+XKtTo6yZp0itcVGnwW5qrgrEvaxD JyMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nwwIH0Xo2RXgqcNECjQA2m73koychi9o/6Iu4JXXooU=; b=fFQA/annF/R07u9HpJBXeluREZMhGa+7r3hKUSyxIST1T93lCrqlGs0iQWdWYQZor5 dEFJtFm2df1C7LjEoxYumqIZS3NNgEGy6mph31qsf5zgvpN+myW4t9Ej1knaAFS/cw8B py/bXRni/2ZqZdq6yvBHq4bsXUYwTWvBo05WragW4diN9wInLGtVy/MueZgRGC9h0jcO VZZmcPjnID3A3tTsINtgVuEXX+/oHwBk4CoHlXInKc+2S+wstOJlDwxSwTzgmN7w/8NU pY2T4BJ8RfY98I5YfRKTNO5JhraheKENsGwrqs8irzU/J2UgTK8rJzlAohLZFDJzhyWh R5KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL/c1zuYFiTdq5lMDmHoZcOsM609eRnWvxjkdD46z8gYwY4KSkN037S+hXzhTomRKPBIrXHKTd1YCvLkA== X-Received: by 10.194.23.37 with SMTP id j5mr5446521wjf.171.1456565770069; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:36:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.91.210 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:35:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:30 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Demand for depriving Gleki of his administratorship and of official-pretending accounts. X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7253471387948611637==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============7253471387948611637== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b414e8c512d33052cbd250c --047d7b414e8c512d33052cbd250c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2016-02-27 11:02 GMT+03:00 guskant : > Introduction. > > Dear LLG members, > > This is an open letter of my simple demand. The identical contents are > published at http://guskant.github.io/lojbo/open_letter/ . The URL is > posted also to the lojban mailing list. > Gleki is an administrator of the official website [1]. Gleki put > useful tools on the official website, and also created a Lojban course > for beginners. In the course, Gleki taught some unofficial features > with notice of "unofficial". That is not a crime. > > Gleki let the learners use the tools that he put on the official > website. That is not a crime. > > Gleki did not make clear the responsible person of the tools. That is a > crime. > > Gleki called the contents of his course as "modern dialects of Lojban" > [2], while Gleki called my parser Zantufa as "different from Lojban" > [3]. That made my life as a Lojbanic artist difficult but is not a > crime. > > Gleki advertised his course using official-pretending accounts of > Twitter [4] or email [5]. That activity combined with his terms of > abuse on my parser Zantufa [3] removed my life as a Lojbanic artist > and is a crime. > > I don't demand to stop any critics on my works including Zantufa. > Actually, Durka42 published much more terms of abuse on my parser > Zantufa than Gleki did, and Tsani also joined Durka42. Although I > qualified them "despicable" [6], I don't demand them to stop their > "critics" on my works. Anyone has freedom to be despicable to me. > > However, I herewith make a complaint against Gleki for abusing his > administratorship on the official website and for his > official-pretending Twitter account [4] and e-mail account [5]. I > demand depriving Gleki of his administratorship on the official > website and of official-pretending accounts [4][5]. The tools put on > the official website by Gleki should be moved to Gleki's own website > other than lojban.org, or kept on the official website and maintained > by a new administrator other than Gleki with clear mentioning about > the responsible person of the tools. > > Details of Gleki's crimes. > > Gleki advertised his course and his tools using official-pretending > accounts. That activity makes people believe that Gleki's contents > were admitted by the official body as "modern dialects of Lojban". > That activity combined with his terms of abuse on my parser Zantufa > produces totalitarism of letting people believe that some unofficial > suggestions are modern dialects of Lojban and my parser Zantufa is > non-Lojban. That totalitarism removes my life as a Lojbanic artist > because all my recent and future Lojbanic artworks are parsed by > Zantufa. I regard that activity of Gleki as an appearance of Gleki's > dictatorship on Lojban community. > > Gleki put tools that may help Lojban speakers on the official website > without any explicit notice about the responsible person of the tools > themselves. For example, the ilmentufa parsers on the official website > [7] were commonly announced on mediawiki pages of the official website > [1], as well as in other communities, that they are parsers for the > official grammar and for an experimental grammar respectively. Those > parsers contain no information about the responsible person for the > contents themselves. Some people may believe that the contents were > identical to those of one of ilmen's or Lojban coder's group's github > repositories[8] [9]. > > The reality [10] is however that the contents on the official website > [1] are identical neither to ilmen's, nor to lojban coder's group's, > but to gleki's personal folder on the vrici server of lojban.org [11] > and also to gleki's github repository [12]. > > The fact that Gleki controls the contents on the official website [1] > is problematic because Gleki does not have ability to distinguish > official from personal. Gleki don't understand all his activities are > not admitted by the official body, regardless of whether the > activities are good or not for Lojban community. The evidences for > that are shown below. > > Evidence 1. > > Gleki removed the expression of "culturally neutral", the official > words of CLL Chapter 1 Section 1, from the top page of the official > website [1] without any notice to the official body. He explained the > reason: "I periodically get some negative feedback or questions and > when no one seem to answer them I remove corresponding strings." [13] > That response is one of the evidence that Gleki does not have ability > to distinguish official from personal: Gleki modified the contents of > the official website freely as if it were his own website. Gleki > removed even the official words from the top page of the official > website for the reason of "some negative feedback" that are unknown to > the official body. > > Evidence 2. > > Gleki is creating many pages on his original research without > mentioning "unofficial contents" or "Gleki's personal page" [14]. > There is no notice about the responsibility of the contents. The > history of modifications to the pages is visible only to logged-in > accounts, and general visitors cannot identify whether the contents > are supported by the official body or not [15]. Although it is true > that LLG-related pages are tagged with "An official page of LLG", that > does not imply that pages with no tag are officially unsupported. When > even the top page is not tagged with "official", who can imagine that > the official website is almost filled with Gleki's original research, > and only a few pages tagged with "official" are really official? > Whether Gleki's original research is good or not is not my subject. > Gleki created many contents of his original research on the official > website without mentioning the responsibility of the contents, and > that is one of the evidence that Gleki does not have ability to > distinguish official from personal. My demand is simple: tag them with > "Gleki's original research/opinion/...", or move them all to Gleki's > own website. > > Evidence 3. > > When I made a remark on Gleki's conceilment of his previous version of > his course, he responded: "Because it's not egocentric and on the > contrary altruistic. What can even be egocentric in an activity for > which personally I gain nothing."[16] > > Actually, Gleki had been revising in keeping the history of pages [17] > [2], but he removed the whole history after my posts to mailing lists > of blaming for his various activities of abusing his administratorship > and using official-pretending accounts. He did not take my remarks as > evidences of his crimes, but he treated the remarks as if they were > feedback to his contents. That is one of the evidence that Gleki does > not have ability to distinguish official from personal: Gleki > completely disregarded my remarks about his confusion of official with > personal, and treated them as if feedback to his personal contents. > > Evidence 4. > > Gleki said "I'm intolerant to everything beyond CLL. Even my > unofficial parsers are merely a playtoy, a tool to study Lojban, not > to break it. Changing Lojban is breaking its community which already > happened once in 2004." [18] > > That comment of Gleki contradicts what he wrote on another page. Gleki > actually "carefully selects new rules and lexicon being introduced > into the language compared to Standard Lojban" [2], clearly mentioning > that the language he taught includes "conflicts with CLL Lojban that > break past usage" [2]. Gleki by himself selected some features beyond > CLL, that conflicts CLL, and taught them as "modern dialects of > Lojban" [2], while publicly excluding my parsers Zantufa from Lojban > works [3]. Nevertheless, Gleki advertised his contents using > official-pretending accounts. That is one of the evidence that Gleki > does not have ability to distinguish official from personal. > > Evidence 5. > > Gleki controls official-pretending accounts on twitter [4]. I offered you that account once. What was your reply? > Besides > retweets of other Lojbanists, some of his tweets are news or response > to feedback to the official website, and most of his tweets are his > personal opinions [19]. That is one of the evidence that Gleki does > not have ability to distinguish official from personal. > > Evidence 6. > > Gleki announced [20] that he prepared a repository on github for > editing the next version of CLL [21]. Gleki modified some critical > points on the draft for the next version of CLL without consulting > BPFK [22] [23]. Gleki explained about one of the modifications: "Since > there is no official policy on how to assess such push requests > another person merged them into the CLL 2.0 branch. After that I had > no idea how the process should go on so I as for {voi} I simply > temporarily commented it out, not removing that content. Maybe I > should have made another push request for it. But push request can > again be merged by someone else." [24] That response is an evidence > that Gleki freely performed his personal experiment on a common > repository of lojban coder's group, not on his personal repository. > Gleki could perform his personal experiment on his own repository > without sending pull request to the common repository, but he did not > choose that way. That is one of the evidence that Gleki does not have > ability to distinguish official from personal. > I think I already explained everything regarding github repo. > > Conclusion. > > I don't demand to stop Gleki's activities on tools, learning > materials, communications etc. I demand only that Gleki should do them > on his own website, using his own account. Don't let Gleki pretend to > be official. Gleki did not sincerely answer to my remarks, and changed > the subjects as if those were feedback to his personal contents. Gleki > does not have ability to recognize hiw own crimes. In order to stop > his dictatorship, there is no way other than depriving Gleki of his > administratorship on the official website and of official-pretending > accounts [4][5]. > As LLG decides. I'm fine with all that "depriving". > References > > [1] https://mw.lojban.org/ > > [2] > https://web.archive.org/web/20151031175123/https://mw.lojban.org/papri/La_Bangu > > [3] From IRC records: > > --- Day changed Mon Aug 10 2015 > 10:43 < gleki> lo catni gerna cu te frica ma'oi GUhA ma'oi GA i ma'i > la zantufa lo cmavo be ma'oi GUhA cu na'e se nitcu jecu ku'i binxo lo > cmavo be ma'oi GA i lu ro mo cu ge mo gi mo li'u ja lu ro mo ge cu mo > gi mo li'u cu se stura lo simsa be tu'a lo catni gerna sei ku'i na'e > dunli > 10:43 < gleki> i di'u se cusku la guskant > 10:43 < gleki> i ja'o lo guskanbau cu banzu frica lo jbobau > > [4] https://twitter.com/lojban_org > > [5] bangu@lojban.org > > [6] https://mw.lojban.org/papri/zantufa/en#Notes > (archive:http://archive.is/Cz1Tt) > > [7] > http://mw.lojban.org/extensions/ilmentufa/camxes.html > (archive: > https://web.archive.org/web/20151015191217/http://mw.lojban.org/extensions/ilmentufa/camxes.html > ) > http://mw.lojban.org/extensions/ilmentufa/camxes-exp.html > (archive: > https://web.archive.org/web/20151127105727/http://mw.lojban.org/extensions/ilmentufa/camxes-exp.html > ) > > [8] https://github.com/Ilmen-vodhr/ilmentufa > > [9] https://github.com/lojban/ilmentufa > > [10] I realized the fact when Gleki destroyed the parsers on mw.lojban.org > : > > https://github.com/lagleki/glekitufa/commit/9dbe1756b016ea567d23e2f0b1201c32bf817a32#commitcomment-15414073 > > [11] http://vrici.lojban.org/~gleki/mw/extensions/ilmentufa/ > > [12] https://github.com/lagleki/glekitufa > > [13] Gleki's post dated 2015-12-17 on the private LLG mailing list. > > [14] For example: > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Principle_of_least_effort > (archive:http://archive.is/6kOXg) > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Eric_S_Raymond's_Tengwar_mapping > (archive:http://archive.is/jhXXz) > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/English_grammatical_person > (archive:http://archive.is/KHTjX) > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Voynichese_Lojbanic > (archive:http://archive.is/4wsw8) > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/turtau (archive: http://archive.is/5gott) > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Nalnuantir (archive:http://archive.is/Isj1Q) > > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Lojban._Converting_from_bridi_to_functions_in_programming_languages(archive > : > http://archive.is/kBAzw) > and many others. > > [15] Actually, even logged-in readers cannot indentify the > responsibility of each page in many cases, because the current > official website mw.lojban.org did not inherit the history from the > previous official tiki website www.lojban.org: the histories of all > the inherited pages begin with Gleki's edition. > > [16] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/jGRYIH6EdSA/BBFdDvutDQAJ > > [17] > https://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=La_Bangu&oldid=116869#Conflicts_with_CLL_Lojban_that_break_past_usage > > [18] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/oriGf4t1_Xc/eSljctvEDAAJ > > [19] http://guskant.github.io/lojbo/open_letter/tsv.html > > [20] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/bpfk-list/mQ-qWyjjssQ/discussion > > [21] https://github.com/lojban/cll/tree/docbook-prince-cll-2.0 > > [22] > https://github.com/lojban/cll/compare/f3bdbe36e4f89d08d56d28cb693fc2ddfbc6785c...6519b9d297dc7e85d616e1a44282a6ada301c631 > > [23] > https://github.com/lojban/cll/commit/7af3f68692a3fa5e44a496ee33676ef74ccd3f07 > > [24] Gleki's post dated 2015-12-25 on the private LLG mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --047d7b414e8c512d33052cbd250c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2016-02-27 11:02 GMT+03:00 guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com><= /span>:
Introduction.

Dear LLG members,

This is an open letter of my simple demand. The identical contents are
published at http://guskant.github.io/lojbo/open_letter/<= /a> . The URL is
posted also to the lojban mailing list.
Gleki is an administrator of the official website [1]. Gleki put
useful tools on the official website, and also created a Lojban course
for beginners. In the course, Gleki taught some unofficial features
with notice of "unofficial". That is not a crime.

Gleki let the learners use the tools that he put on the official
website. That is not a crime.

Gleki did not make clear the responsible person of the tools. That is a cri= me.

Gleki called the contents of his course as "modern dialects of Lojban&= quot;
[2], while Gleki called my parser Zantufa as "different from Lojban&qu= ot;
[3]. That made my life as a Lojbanic artist difficult but is not a
crime.

Gleki advertised his course using official-pretending accounts of
Twitter [4] or email [5]. That activity combined with his terms of
abuse on my parser Zantufa [3] removed my life as a Lojbanic artist
and is a crime.

I don't demand to stop any critics on my works including Zantufa.
Actually, Durka42 published much more terms of abuse on my parser
Zantufa than Gleki did, and Tsani also joined Durka42. Although I
qualified them "despicable" [6], I don't demand them to stop = their
"critics" on my works. Anyone has freedom to be despicable to me.=

However, I herewith make a complaint against Gleki for abusing his
administratorship on the official website and for his
official-pretending Twitter account [4] and e-mail account [5]. I
demand depriving Gleki of his administratorship on the official
website and of official-pretending accounts [4][5]. The tools put on
the official website by Gleki should be moved to Gleki's own website other than
lojban.org, or kept on the official website and maintained
by a new administrator other than Gleki with clear mentioning about
the responsible person of the tools.

Details of Gleki's crimes.

Gleki advertised his course and his tools using official-pretending
accounts. That activity makes people believe that Gleki's contents
were admitted by the official body as "modern dialects of Lojban"= .
That activity combined with his terms of abuse on my parser Zantufa
produces totalitarism of letting people believe that some unofficial
suggestions are modern dialects of Lojban and my parser Zantufa is
non-Lojban. That totalitarism removes my life as a Lojbanic artist
because all my recent and future Lojbanic artworks are parsed by
Zantufa. I regard that activity of Gleki as an appearance of Gleki's dictatorship on Lojban community.

Gleki put tools that may help Lojban speakers on the official website
without any explicit notice about the responsible person of the tools
themselves. For example, the ilmentufa parsers on the official website
[7] were commonly announced on mediawiki pages of the official website
[1], as well as in other communities, that they are parsers for the
official grammar and for an experimental grammar respectively. Those
parsers contain no information about the responsible person for the
contents themselves. Some people may believe that the contents were
identical to those of one of ilmen's or Lojban coder's group's = github
repositories[8] [9].

The reality [10] is however that the contents on the official website
[1] are identical neither to ilmen's, nor to lojban coder's group&#= 39;s,
but to gleki's personal folder on the vrici server of lojban.org [11]
and also to gleki's github repository [12].

The fact that Gleki controls the contents on the official website [1]
is problematic because Gleki does not have ability to distinguish
official from personal. Gleki don't understand all his activities are not admitted by the official body, regardless of whether the
activities are good or not for Lojban community. The evidences for
that are shown below.

Evidence 1.

Gleki removed the expression of "culturally neutral", the officia= l
words of CLL Chapter 1 Section 1, from the top page of the official
website [1] without any notice to the official body. He explained the
reason: "I periodically get some negative feedback or questions and when no one seem to answer them I remove corresponding strings." [13]<= br> That response is one of the evidence that Gleki does not have ability
to distinguish official from personal: Gleki modified the contents of
the official website freely as if it were his own website. Gleki
removed even the official words from the top page of the official
website for the reason of "some negative feedback" that are unkno= wn to
the official body.

Evidence 2.

Gleki is creating many pages on his original research without
mentioning "unofficial contents" or "Gleki's personal pa= ge" [14].
There is no notice about the responsibility of the contents. The
history of modifications to the pages is visible only to logged-in
accounts, and general visitors cannot identify whether the contents
are supported by the official body or not [15]. Although it is true
that LLG-related pages are tagged with "An official page of LLG",= that
does not imply that pages with no tag are officially unsupported. When
even the top page is not tagged with "official", who can imagine = that
the official website is almost filled with Gleki's original research, and only a few pages tagged with "official" are really official?<= br> Whether Gleki's original research is good or not is not my subject.
Gleki created many contents of his original research on the official
website without mentioning the responsibility of the contents, and
that is one of the evidence that Gleki does not have ability to
distinguish official from personal. My demand is simple: tag them with
"Gleki's original research/opinion/...", or move them all to = Gleki's
own website.

Evidence 3.

When I made a remark on Gleki's conceilment of his previous version of<= br> his course, he responded: "Because it's not egocentric and on the<= br> contrary altruistic. What can even be egocentric in an activity for
which personally I gain nothing."[16]

Actually, Gleki had been revising in keeping the history of pages [17]
[2], but he removed the whole history after my posts to mailing lists
of blaming for his various activities of abusing his administratorship
and using official-pretending accounts. He did not take my remarks as
evidences of his crimes, but he treated the remarks as if they were
feedback to his contents. That is one of the evidence that Gleki does
not have ability to distinguish official from personal: Gleki
completely disregarded my remarks about his confusion of official with
personal, and treated them as if feedback to his personal contents.

Evidence 4.

Gleki said "I'm intolerant to everything beyond CLL. Even my
unofficial parsers are merely a playtoy, a tool to study Lojban, not
to break it. Changing Lojban is breaking its community which already
happened once in 2004." [18]

That comment of Gleki contradicts what he wrote on another page. Gleki
actually "carefully selects new rules and lexicon being introduced
into the language compared to Standard Lojban" [2], clearly mentioning=
that the language he taught includes "conflicts with CLL Lojban that break past usage" [2]. Gleki by himself selected some features beyond<= br> CLL, that conflicts CLL, and taught them as "modern dialects of
Lojban" [2], while publicly excluding my parsers Zantufa from Lojban works [3]. Nevertheless, Gleki advertised his contents using
official-pretending accounts. That is one of the evidence that Gleki
does not have ability to distinguish official from personal.

Evidence 5.

Gleki controls official-pretending accounts on twitter [4].

I offered you that account once. What was your reply?

=C2=A0
Besides retweets of other Lojbanists, some of his tweets are news or response
to feedback to the official website, and most of his tweets are his
personal opinions [19]. That is one of the evidence that Gleki does
not have ability to distinguish official from personal.

Evidence 6.

Gleki announced [20] that he prepared a repository on github for
editing the next version of CLL [21]. Gleki modified some critical
points on the draft for the next version of CLL without consulting
BPFK [22] [23]. Gleki explained about one of the modifications: "Since=
there is no official policy on how to assess such push requests
another person merged them into the CLL 2.0 branch. After that I had
no idea how the process should go on so I as for {voi} I simply
temporarily commented it out, not removing that content. Maybe I
should have made another push request for it. But push request can
again be merged by someone else." [24] That response is an evidence that Gleki freely performed his personal experiment on a common
repository of lojban coder's group, not on his personal repository.
Gleki could perform his personal experiment on his own repository
without sending pull request to the common repository, but he did not
choose that way. That is one of the evidence that Gleki does not have
ability to distinguish official from personal.

I think I already explained everything regarding github repo.
=
=C2=A0

Conclusion.

I don't demand to stop Gleki's activities on tools, learning
materials, communications etc. I demand only that Gleki should do them
on his own website, using his own account. Don't let Gleki pretend to be official. Gleki did not sincerely answer to my remarks, and changed
the subjects as if those were feedback to his personal contents. Gleki
does not have ability to recognize hiw own crimes. In order to stop
his dictatorship, there is no way other than depriving Gleki of his
administratorship on the official website and of official-pretending
accounts [4][5].


As LLG = decides. I'm fine with all that "depriving".


References

[1] https://mw.lojban.org/

[2] https://web.archi= ve.org/web/20151031175123/https://mw.lojban.org/papri/La_Bangu

[3] From IRC records:

--- Day changed Mon Aug 10 2015
10:43 < gleki> lo catni gerna cu te frica ma'oi GUhA ma'oi GA= i ma'i
la zantufa lo cmavo be ma'oi GUhA cu na'e se nitcu jecu ku'i bi= nxo lo
cmavo be ma'oi GA i lu ro mo cu ge mo gi mo li'u ja lu ro mo ge cu = mo
gi mo li'u cu se stura lo simsa be tu'a lo catni gerna sei ku'i= na'e
dunli
10:43 < gleki> i di'u se cusku la guskant
10:43 < gleki> i ja'o lo guskanbau cu banzu frica lo jbobau

[4] https://twitter.com/lojban_org

[5] bangu@lojban.org<= /a>

[6]
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/zantufa/en#Notes
(archive:http://archive.is/Cz1Tt)

[7]
http://mw.lojban.org/extensions/ilmentufa/camxe= s.html
(archive:https://web.archive.org/web/20151015191217/http://mw.lojban.org/extens= ions/ilmentufa/camxes.html)
http://mw.lojban.org/extensions/ilmentufa= /camxes-exp.html
(archive:https://web.archive.org/web/20151127105727/http://mw.lojban.org/ex= tensions/ilmentufa/camxes-exp.html)

[8] https://github.com/Ilmen-vodhr/ilmentufa

[9] https://github.com/lojban/ilmentufa

[10] I realized the fact when Gleki destroyed the parsers on mw.lojban.org:<= br> https://github.com/lagleki/glekitufa/commit/9dbe1756b016ea567d23e2f0= b1201c32bf817a32#commitcomment-15414073

[11] http://vrici.lojban.org/~gleki/mw/extens= ions/ilmentufa/

[12] https://github.com/lagleki/glekitufa

[13] Gleki's post dated 2015-12-17 on the private LLG mailing list.

[14] For example:
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Principle_of_least_= effort
(archive:http://archive.is/6kOXg)
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Eric_S_R= aymond's_Tengwar_mapping
(archive:http://archive.is/jhXXz)
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/English_grammatica= l_person
(archive:http://archive.is/KHTjX)
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Voynichese_Lojbanic (archive:http://archive.is/4wsw8)
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/turtau (archive: http://archive.is/5= gott)
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Nalnuantir (archive:http://archi= ve.is/Isj1Q)
https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Lojban._Converting_from_bridi_to_functions_i= n_programming_languages(archive:
ht= tp://archive.is/kBAzw)
and many others.

[15] Actually, even logged-in readers cannot indentify the
responsibility of each page in many cases, because the current
official website mw.lojban.org did not inherit the history from the
previous official tiki website www.lojban.org: the histories of all
the inherited pages begin with Gleki's edition.

[16] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/= lojban/jGRYIH6EdSA/BBFdDvutDQAJ

[17] https://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=3DLa_Bangu&o= ldid=3D116869#Conflicts_with_CLL_Lojban_that_break_past_usage

[18] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/= lojban/oriGf4t1_Xc/eSljctvEDAAJ

[19] http://guskant.github.io/lojbo/open_letter/t= sv.html

[20] https://groups.google.com/d/t= opic/bpfk-list/mQ-qWyjjssQ/discussion

[21] https://github.com/lojban/cll/tree/doc= book-prince-cll-2.0

[22] https://github.com/lojban/cll/compare/f3bdbe36e4f= 89d08d56d28cb693fc2ddfbc6785c...6519b9d297dc7e85d616e1a44282a6ada301c631

[23]
https://github.com= /lojban/cll/commit/7af3f68692a3fa5e44a496ee33676ef74ccd3f07

[24] Gleki's post dated 2015-12-25 on the private LLG mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

--047d7b414e8c512d33052cbd250c-- --===============7253471387948611637== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============7253471387948611637==--