Received: from localhost ([::1]:53686 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1acrCK-0000vf-4r; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:11:28 -0800 Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]:35157) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1acrCC-0000mx-Lm for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:11:24 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e6so110383013vkh.2 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:11:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=VHA38/ZkO7bwukQCuh+ypE8BlbIOK+urwz0E1bHBqJw=; b=GWSXsraoacXC3/rBwwqdJ5KIaUzBdrHOlySkHVupoIapuR/Ydj+liWD04B2WvTbSH/ kJJHI2/UXyInWijbLB2zFAW5c52R8xKuhU0sK8zZ1zPIPWgu/9fobH8ojo77Kd1v6o7H YCNQpUs3Aqsx9Yf9+Q4VVXi/c7ETFPsPtFWN+klseRfYANDLv+mCpnsPY8u+cgfeaEuW LNoqXt0wI1ucw1d8hGp8RfiNG0lyg+tPiOg08qgUPn0UB2DJrgfk8zlDWF8IyIOIBshB obr16LtU1KDcan+5OzHXqHlaU8cUatHxHqeDOXlj7LjQvuB80HZx1dz67x3+JdZTLMkv Rv2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=VHA38/ZkO7bwukQCuh+ypE8BlbIOK+urwz0E1bHBqJw=; b=Jb9c2hbb4h4nFsv8SzXpcwZFHqwyL4sGz9dX6IpasDT93kJ5bTHMkAa48XCD07vtpL T7t+zNU0zlh4ggx20r1jnpLcHPbjaIQiDiaiB5pr/bKWydxZOq4zKOkFG/8VvrW5Lsc/ WdwMdwRmfx3vBt+JvW6gN/8n4JU7R67jLxXazeVWL6dmchfLJD/PS4EWtn1IueRs7vR4 y4L37qq1VSq63V9aCPZqC79VTLv1ZclBA2+wm9mWt1njKROZjrga4T2oQdkWqCvMKsGk BjeEXIpFGjQvatNgKaa6PDmE+cl+YIhCGk00l9A1H0R1J0And9VLmIDSLDn+WgnjgVV8 jZYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLPguP9Pooi5kWX4DbM+EbNzNfhG4DR1nZeTfoVkurr9aUTrNCLTdqyZpAaQeFyUrY/6hCoZSyhcy7VIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.52.78 with SMTP id b75mr19721298vka.77.1457341874723; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:11:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.159.38.135 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:11:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.159.38.135 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:11:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com> <56C1998B.5050005@lojban.org> <82DDFA36-4BF2-44E7-AF8A-8A810E50EE0A@gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20160302202535.032fcf18@cox.net> <56D83411.7010708@lojban.org> <0C990E0D-8744-4953-AF3E-20D14740B59A@gmail.com> <78EAFF74-5A30-4315-921C-4208B456EC69@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 04:11:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Curtis Franks To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Clarification of votes X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0926429979346411088==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============0926429979346411088== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11430c7ac25f33052d71d8be --001a11430c7ac25f33052d71d8be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not sure that that helped, since I basically maintained my conditional. But, now, you get to decide when/whether the condition is satisfied! On Mar 7, 2016 04:10, "Curtis Franks" wrote: > Do you need me to be less provisional? I had the caveat that I would vote > for myself if any of the people that I had listed declined. If we are > starting to solidify answers, then it might be better for me to just pick= a > solid, unconditional ballot. > > Assuming that you do (if not, then ignore what follows in this message > until you do), I remove Alex Burka (durka42) from the list of my votes in > favor of myself, although Indo believe that he is a capable and engaged > Lojbanist. > On Mar 6, 2016 22:55, "Craig Daniel" wrote: > >> I vote as per your interpretation, yes. >> >> - Craig >> >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016, 10:49 PM Ali Sajid Imami >> wrote: >> >>> I'll revise my list to the following: >>> >>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>> >>> > Curtis Franks >>> > Ali Sajid Imani >>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>> > And Rosta >>> >>> > Miles Forster (selpa'i) >>> On Mar 7, 2016 8:41 AM, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ali, I count 8 votes here, but you only have 7 to give. It=E2=80=99s y= our >>>> choice which one, but if it makes it easier, I would be glad to lose y= our >>>> vote in favor of the others. =E2=80=94Riley >>>> >>>> On Mar 6, 2016, at 10:31 PM, Ali Sajid Imami >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree with the following interpretation: >>>> >>>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>>> > Curtis Franks >>>> > Ali Sajid Imani >>>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>>> > And Rosta >>>> > Karen Stein >>>> > Miles Forster (selpa'i) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ali Sajid Imami >>>> CTO >>>> Khabaristan Times >>>> LinkedIn >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:57 AM, guskant wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2016-03-07 1:25 GMT+00:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch : >>>>> > In preparation for the end of voting, I tallied votes, but was >>>>> uncertain how to record the votes for Craig and Ali. >>>>> > >>>>> > Craig voted for "everybody else on the ballot=E2=80=9D. Given the t= iming of >>>>> the vote, I would be inclined to interpret that =E2=80=93 using lojba= b=E2=80=99s list =E2=80=93 as: >>>>> > >>>>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>>>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>>>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>>>> > And Rosta >>>>> > Karen Stein >>>>> > guskant >>>>> > >>>>> > Ali voted for =E2=80=9Ceveryone currently on the ballot=E2=80=9D. B= y the time of the >>>>> vote, Ali and Curtis had declared themselves candidates; guskant migh= t not >>>>> be a candidate at this point, according to her intention to decline >>>>> nomination in the case that there were more than seven candidates. Al= ex >>>>> Burka had also received votes, but had not accepted nomination. >>>>> Accordingly, I would be inclined to interpret Ali=E2=80=99s vote as: >>>>> > >>>>> > Arkadii Balandin (gleki) >>>>> > Curtis Franks >>>>> > Ali Sajid Imani >>>>> > Robert LeChevalier (lojbab) >>>>> > Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti) >>>>> > And Rosta >>>>> > Karen Stein >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Miles Forster (selpa'i) had already received four (4) votes before >>>>> Ali's vote. Alex Burka (durka42) neither declined nor accepted >>>>> nomination, but Selpa'i accepted nomination just after Ali's vote. >>>>> Sorry for interruption but it's for clarification. >>>>> >>>>> mi'e la guskant >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Llg-members mailing list >>>>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>>>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Llg-members mailing list >>>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Llg-members mailing list >>>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> --001a11430c7ac25f33052d71d8be Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not sure that that helped, since I basically maintained= my conditional. But, now, you get to decide when/whether the condition is = satisfied!

On Mar 7, 2016 04:10, "Curtis Franks" = <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:

Do you need me to be less provisional? I had the caveat that I wo= uld vote for myself if any of the people that I had listed declined. If we = are starting to solidify answers, then it might be better for me to just pi= ck a solid, unconditional ballot.

Assuming that you do (if not, then ignore what follows in th= is message until you do), I remove Alex Burka (durka42) from the list of my= votes in favor of myself, although Indo believe that he is a capable and e= ngaged Lojbanist.

On Mar 6, 2016 22:55, "Craig Daniel" &= lt;craigbdaniel= @gmail.com> wrote:

I vote as per your interpretation, yes.

- Craig


On Sun, Mar 6, 2016, 10:49 = PM=C2=A0Ali Sajid Imami <ali.sajid.imami@gmail.com> wrote:

I'll revise my list to the followi= ng:

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gleki)=

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Curtis Franks
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ali Sajid Imani
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Rosta

> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Miles Forster (selpa'i)

On Mar 7, 2016 8:41 AM, "Riley Martinez-Lyn= ch" <shunp= iker@gmail.com> wrote:
Ali, I count 8 votes her= e, but you only have 7 to give. It=E2=80=99s your choice which one, but if = it makes it easier, I would be glad to lose your vote in favor of the other= s. =E2=80=94Riley

O= n Mar 6, 2016, at 10:31 PM, Ali Sajid Imami <ali.sajid.imami@gmail.com> wrote= :

I agree with the following interpretati= on:

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gl= eki)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Curtis Franks
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ali Sajid Imani
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0R= iley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Ros= ta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Karen Stein
<= span style=3D"color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.= 8px">> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Miles Forster (selpa'i)



Regards,<= div>Ali Sajid Imami
CTO

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:57 AM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-03-07 1:25 GMT+00:00 Riley Martinez-Lynch <shunpiker@gmail.com>: > In preparation for the end of voting, I tallied votes, but was uncerta= in how to record the votes for Craig and Ali.
>
> Craig voted for "everybody else on the ballot=E2=80=9D. Given the= timing of the vote, I would be inclined to interpret that =E2=80=93 using = lojbab=E2=80=99s list =E2=80=93 as:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gleki)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Rosta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Karen Stein
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0guskant
>
> Ali voted for =E2=80=9Ceveryone currently on the ballot=E2=80=9D. By t= he time of the vote, Ali and Curtis had declared themselves candidates; gus= kant might not be a candidate at this point, according to her intention to = decline nomination in the case that there were more than seven candidates. = Alex Burka had also received votes, but had not accepted nomination. Accord= ingly, I would be inclined to interpret Ali=E2=80=99s vote as:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Arkadii Balandin (gleki)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Curtis Franks
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ali Sajid Imani
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Robert LeChevalier (lojbab)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Riley Martinez-Lynch (mukti)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0And Rosta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Karen Stein
>

Miles Forster (selpa'i) had already received four (4) votes befo= re
Ali's vote. Alex Burka (durka42) neither declined nor accepted
nomination, but Selpa'i accepted nomination just after Ali's vote.<= br> Sorry for interruption but it's for clarification.

mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list=
Llg-members= @lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs


__________________________= _____________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

--001a11430c7ac25f33052d71d8be-- --===============0926429979346411088== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============0926429979346411088==--