Received: from localhost ([::1]:50508 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ajx6T-0003IM-Mc; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:54:45 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net ([68.230.241.216]:59405) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ajx6N-0003HM-Tf for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:54:44 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo109.cox.net ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20160326225434.OXSC18342.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo109.cox.net> for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.244.98]) by eastrmimpo109.cox.net with cox id amuZ1s00C2869s801muZV4; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:33 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.56F71329.00E3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=LPboQfm9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:117 a=JFEMeGVUNR3hGa77igez4Q==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=YXTHvMA3sHpAYvQzkPoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <8BCCD0E2-E6D4-4687-9D89-D177E69E1259@gmail.com> <56DE1D83.8050901@lojban.org> <8EC7FC36-8C8F-43FD-AE6A-C704D1D9C2CE@gmail.com> <12678381.nPyR9sEY1K@caracal> <56E0AE11.8020708@lojban.org> <56E1F54E.3040501@lojban.org> <56EF1C47.6060900@lojban.org> <56F467BF.9060405@lojban.org> From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: <56F7132A.90308@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:54:34 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Note: SpamAssassin invocation failed Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2015 Annual Meeting - Old Business X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 3/24/2016 10:13 PM, Curtis Franks wrote: > > I think that it can be safely understood that the BYFY is charged > with maintaining CLL as the defining standard for the language as a > whole and its grammar. > > In order for clarity, I hereby move that: Whensoever a BPFK exists, > whensoever a CLL exists, and whensoever a Lojban language is to have any > defining standards in whole or in part, then the BPFK is charged with > maintaining the CLL as the defining standard(s) for the language or any > of its versions as a whole or in part, including but not limited to its > grammar. The BPFK is to have the authority necessary for the achieving > of these goals, as determined and prescribed solely by this body (the > LLG). This motion is not intended to make assertions as to the merits or > implementation of the existence or practice of any of these conditions; > it merely defines one of possibly many roles (for) which any > organization which is to act as a BPFK will be responsible in fulfilling > and conducting - as well as the implicit establishment of minimal powers > associated with its acting in that capacity. > > Furthermore, I move that: Under the same conditions, the BPFK is the > unique organization so charged and endowed with the authority pursuant > to these goals. This motion has been made, and seconded by gleki, and objected to by And. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members