Received: from localhost ([::1]:49691 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1asF4z-00074g-V4; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:43:29 -0700 Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]:34266) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1asF4t-00074Z-3S for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:43:27 -0700 Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e185so233084164vkb.1 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:43:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HeR5++Y5jrvmNaikvdOYGFfev1gh600sVTCK+Oi/5NE=; b=dZAAMaOFzl71u6BJD9O8A+TvnR1VcfWblwWN2/ZSC74y0KkxLsG2ockklFxpKuzJ7f X+TeAf6D+rTlp0STGAbtDpQMvYf9qvyFvlwmSsPGDX3W2/AWX4oh2Qd+Xy2dGqkT87xt 9XSbdrwJbJiSE3oWlS2SGpRRcQgeVio08rffanfAzTktOR7bo1eTuOpfYrvJa4vyL1w1 rjNIOAPz1s2fgbWqqRKVVoQm9e+HoM2jomRvXsn8HNJz+6e1i4zrttMxJo9vgicDdnAd Oh6TY643CL2xMCgxy9PAvKaD5pHSkjPJvLewVjhEKKxXrOEK20Icadub5T/kYbnye93Q EKGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=HeR5++Y5jrvmNaikvdOYGFfev1gh600sVTCK+Oi/5NE=; b=LfGFHmQT1yDuelkwwcS5KiHc8k7qTMWmRQywWQ9m5eNswDTr/Y09WEqoAUGBg8qiLT bg0A8RQeDJZ2Bxnu81QMQEj2tLtoj9gTJFlVV/jTamYKESQo8i1r931PMfROM4hBYF8G aq5th6OhKD02RBN2j8UQYB0Sa56DEF7Q0+tRJrBbLCk3rjvU/rTqbQLGXV8MAZ79o5Wn 2F+YQX+kS/wO5OC9F+2OLJyXP19AP4X5iqkwMFAnNBTOs5G37mH0W14pLu9oWXSTaBcS umiNcufmEMKKUdkfo95+DPkkuLTAeg+y3m/WTUL7o3nzJKX9oYycv+mirFECFcCY7l2o KREg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWACyjWsVGVvpAu9Ks5lrDzw4el13KHf/MF3MyPh2rbhQKi+dXK4C7PgGREgBPx1St3UnHwYAadszqoIQ== X-Received: by 10.176.69.242 with SMTP id u105mr7363666uau.101.1461008596812; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.66.195 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:42:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57152A58.3080305@lojban.org> References: <571271C9.7050002@lojban.org> <50A08C82-B160-4ADB-B5D9-D2FBB307C32E@gmail.com> <57152A58.3080305@lojban.org> From: Adam Lopresto Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:42:57 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] *** CHAIR INTERRUPTS DISCUSSION FOR MOTION TO ADJOURN *** Re: Annual meeting: New Business, anyone? X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0580705723219628457==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============0580705723219628457== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c11b4a86d4b6a0530c79227 --94eb2c11b4a86d4b6a0530c79227 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I vote against adjournment. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > On 4/17/2016 9:30 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: > >> I am in the middle of a seven-game home stand, and I'll be out of town >> on business when it ends, so I don't believe I'm likely to be any more >> so until next week. In the interests of fast processes, I hereby give my >> proxy to la .karis., effective from just after this message until 23:59 >> EDT on April 26. >> >> For the sake of procedure being ensured to reflect membership >> intentions, I second the motion to adjourn, but cast my vote on the >> procedural point this immediately triggers as .ienai / Nay. >> > > Per the statement of the Parliamentarian, this second triggers an > immediate vote WITHOUT discussion. > > Thus, please stop discussing the various other motions and topics that > (finally) attracted some discussion, until a majority has voted one way or > another on the motion to adjourn. > > While I suspect that some other people have already voted on adjournment > embedded in the messages already posted, I ask that people explicitly vote > on the motion to adjourn ***in a separate post***. > > (I will accept this message as Craig's vote given his explanation, but I'd > rather not even read the existing discussion posts (to look for adjournment > votes), so that I can keep track of what motions are on the floor, if the > meeting is not adjourned.) > > Please vote. If I see a majority of the entire membership voting one way > or another, I will rule on adjournment without waiting. Otherwise, voting > on the motion to adjourn continues until end of day Wednesday (20 April) UT > (and a majority of the votes cast will then determine the result) > > lojbab > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --94eb2c11b4a86d4b6a0530c79227 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I vote against adjournment.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Bob LeChe= valier, President and Founder - LLG <lojbab@lojban.org> wrot= e:
On 4/17/2016 9:30 PM, Craig Daniel wro= te:
I am in the middle of a seven-game home stand, and I'll be out of town<= br> on business when it ends, so I don't believe I'm likely to be any m= ore
so until next week. In the interests of fast processes, I hereby give my proxy to la .karis., effective from just after this message until 23:59
EDT on April 26.

For the sake of procedure being ensured to reflect membership
intentions, I second the motion to adjourn, but cast my vote on the
procedural point this immediately triggers as .ienai / Nay.

Per the statement of the Parliamentarian, this second triggers an immediate= vote WITHOUT discussion.

Thus, please stop discussing the various other motions and topics that (fin= ally) attracted some discussion, until a majority has voted one way or anot= her on the motion to adjourn.

While I suspect that some other people have already voted on adjournment em= bedded in the messages already posted, I ask that people explicitly vote on= the motion to adjourn ***in a separate post***.

(I will accept this message as Craig's vote given his explanation, but = I'd rather not even read the existing discussion posts (to look for adj= ournment votes), so that I can keep track of what motions are on the floor,= if the meeting is not adjourned.)

Please vote.=C2=A0 If I see a majority of the entire membership voting one = way or another, I will rule on adjournment without waiting.=C2=A0 Otherwise= , voting on the motion to adjourn continues until end of day Wednesday (20 = April) UT (and a majority of the votes cast will then determine the result)=

lojbab

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-membe= rs

--94eb2c11b4a86d4b6a0530c79227-- --===============0580705723219628457== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============0580705723219628457==--