Received: from localhost ([::1]:38002 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ccrMw-0007a0-7P; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:26:58 -0800 Received: from mail-vk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:34536) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ccrMp-0007YV-5O for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:26:55 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id r136so47654563vke.1 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:26:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QnwXrCZsusH2e+XxXLGbKMBH9nKEWMe8xNAoyhf+sNE=; b=KrvPScLx+JGDmIscNPb57UzxqEC3vBYkprDxOqWaDN2o6zTF//Og6FRyiDDy90Wad+ N2cMomS0Qj2wqTLmGqH5Ql+d8IyI/e7u10YPqNCAFziN0nsRxWLgxkc+GWmZeQf+/nwC 5OSI92lIunUo+cw3Oem288LySHxpF/qK1zQUEjvSdIyMiPmLiApoaJi1WAxGu1/8jxhq cTS7EtgylA11z/fwxN+SPELCLI4CSEcwKogz1PVvA3xQc/ydcJCDO5so+3FpWwMz8gC+ T6TxIIFd/3Z8SrmS0yVOlYrg3ikGvdBjlUZvQ9U+VVWwJ9LIm8MVXyn9xqSsEQMzS9pb wsJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=QnwXrCZsusH2e+XxXLGbKMBH9nKEWMe8xNAoyhf+sNE=; b=cllp+zwG1RgSZI191hqhoeh3/mSR98iyLmP/LtP9quqZymfxiWDKb+R0DboUBhSnDi l9Fj6xvyTz4MLctWLFd4LD/Y8s2FgOiP5lUgt/SamtgA+e6tPs1OW9YLgoxSOUG5FtIh CIqTe1NTGdLC3D4oi1UAlv+yKhjKX85oXvCoAgFt8BYPKLiABKZjQskkA/0XiBUcokD7 7AHz6u4lWBfYAZKj/2aaF1xGG44LxmAHKrYCuOHTic8NkjZ/83vGODhNZU77CgFBpGIz xUGh05KI6dcVaBjxeHl4B7nWfW3SodOUxXUBkfyU3956kaX9F/NiHqI7PkHwEf8F9PIA utCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mXK3zoj3Uzkfa1hbsB3bMtLJpSWhrosymxhYrt9LbYn6eI9XsNYk9d1lsgrYp7HWFb+jcSzSiUHyVmDg== X-Received: by 10.31.252.77 with SMTP id a74mr8623728vki.46.1486895204738; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:26:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.6.202 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.6.202 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:26:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Curtis Franks Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 05:26:44 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2016 Annual Meeting of the Logical Language Group, Inc. - call to order and roll call X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4012207175436524137==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============4012207175436524137== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c149b287f2e97054852c45d --94eb2c149b287f2e97054852c45d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maybe we could rotate the start time so that everyone eventually gets preferenced (or dispreferenced) cyclically? On Feb 8, 2017 10:16, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" wrote: > I don=E2=80=99t have an officer=E2=80=99s report to share yet, but I do h= ave a pulse and a > few minutes, so I wanted to check in. > > One of the reasons that I=E2=80=99d like to change the way that we do mee= tings is > that it is difficult for me to accommodate them in my schedule when I don= =E2=80=99t > know when they are going to start or how long they are going to run. For > example, I had time to attend to the meeting in December, but I=E2=80=99m= finding > it hard to make that time now. > > I strongly support people discussing the kinds of things that are relevan= t > to LLG at all times. But I don=E2=80=99t think that most of those discuss= ions need > to happen on the record and in a decision-enacting context =E2=80=94 the = difference > between an LLG meeting and the lojban emailing list. > > I would strongly prefer that we adopt a format like the Language Creation > Society: We fix the agenda for the meeting beforehand, and conduct the > entire meeting in IRC in a period of hours. There have been objections to > this plan before on the basis that it=E2=80=99s hard to find a time which= works for > people all over the world. While I agree that it=E2=80=99s important for = the way > that we conduct business to reflect the value that we place on Lojban=E2= =80=99s > international character, as far as I can tell the current format works we= ll > for no one. We can do better. > > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > --94eb2c149b287f2e97054852c45d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Maybe we could rotate the start time so that everyone eve= ntually gets preferenced (or dispreferenced) cyclically?

On Feb 8, 2017 10:16, "Ri= ley Martinez-Lynch" <shunpik= er@gmail.com> wrote:
I don=E2=80=99t have an officer=E2=80=99s report to share yet, but = I do have a pulse and a few minutes, so I wanted to check in.

One of the reasons that I=E2=80=99d like to change the way that we do meeti= ngs is that it is difficult for me to accommodate them in my schedule when = I don=E2=80=99t know when they are going to start or how long they are goin= g to run. For example, I had time to attend to the meeting in December, but= I=E2=80=99m finding it hard to make that time now.

I strongly support people discussing the kinds of things that are relevant = to LLG at all times. But I don=E2=80=99t think that most of those discussio= ns need to happen on the record and in a decision-enacting context =E2=80= =94 the difference between an LLG meeting and the lojban emailing list.

I would strongly prefer that we adopt a format like the Language Creation S= ociety: We fix the agenda for the meeting beforehand, and conduct the entir= e meeting in IRC in a period of hours. There have been objections to this p= lan before on the basis that it=E2=80=99s hard to find a time which works f= or people all over the world. While I agree that it=E2=80=99s important for= the way that we conduct business to reflect the value that we place on Loj= ban=E2=80=99s international character, as far as I can tell the current for= mat works well for no one. We can do better.


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members
--94eb2c149b287f2e97054852c45d-- --===============4012207175436524137== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============4012207175436524137==--