Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cem0t-00049f-Ch for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:08:07 -0800 Received: from [23.227.200.226] (port=40626 helo=political.yournewcandidateupdates.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cem0r-00048t-G0 for lojban@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:08:06 -0800 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:12:35 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit From: HSI-Alert To: lojban@lojban.org Subject: Alert: All Trump-Supporters Need to Take a Look at This. Priority: Normal Message-ID: Reply-To: HSI-Alert@yournewcandidateupdates.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.7 X-Spam_score_int: 47 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 02 - 17 - 2017. ====================================================================. Political-Revenge Alert-No.687720757236. ====================================================================. Greetings lojban@lojban.org, [...] Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: yournewcandidateupdates.com] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 2.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT To: lacks brackets + percentage 02 - 17 - 2017. ====================================================================. Political-Revenge Alert-No.687720757236. ====================================================================. Greetings lojban@lojban.org, This has just been-leaked; There is now concrete-evidence that Hillary did in fact-rig the 2016 election and STILL-lost...and she is NOT-happy about this information getting out. All Trump-supporters need to check this out; Just when we'd thought that we had FINALLY seen the end of crooked-ways, she has one more-dirty trick hidden up her sleeves. She is angry and wants revenge on all Trump-supporters; you need to see this video right-away, because who knows when she will have it taken down or even banned. Go here to watch-this shocking-video right away: http://voterinfo.yournewcandidateupdates.com http://eztr2.yournewcandidateupdates.com You can.quit these politicalads-if you'd prefer by going-right here. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. -_2885 Sanford.Ave.Southwest No.4O442. *-Grandville. -_MlCHlGAN - ZIPCODE: #494l8. It???s a very interesting and hard question to answer. I???ll give you the short version. In the 1990s, a huge deal was made about Hillary Clinton???s overqualification to be First Lady. She was inarguably smarter than any First Lady in modern history, and could arguably be considered smarter than her husband. Interview after interview pressed her on her ???ambition,??? which became a codeword for her being a dishonest and uppity woman who wouldn???t recognize her place. Here???s a stellar example of this from the ???92 election As you can see, even then she was viewed as a vaguely dishonest and shifty character. At the same time, the Clintons??? political opponents discovered a bombshell from their past wherein they invested in a failed start-up (???Whitewater???) that was eventually pegged in an FBI investigation for tax fraud and evasion. Bill and Hillary were loosely implicated by association, and the ensuing scandal threatened to both sink Bill???s 1992 presidential bid and the first few years of his presidency. The primary legal council/aide that helped the Clintons skirt indictment in Whitewater was a man named Vince Foster, who was very close with Hillary (to the point where many speculate that they were having an affair). He later killed himself, and many conspiracy theorists say he was silenced to put a nail in the whole Whitewater thing. Despite being the subject of conclusive FBI investigations, Whitewater still possesses a mythical quality in some circles, forever damning the Clintons to the perception of malfeasance. The Monica Lewinsky and Juanita Broadrick sex scandals involving Bill also cast aspersions on their innocence. While both were litigated in court and both were found to simply be affairs and not rape or coercive sexual encounters, the right clinged onto them as the sole method of disparaging the Clintons (Bill, as horrible a deviant as he was, was an almost historically skilled politician, and hitting him effectively was damn-near impossible). So we have another situation where a shady situation that the Clintons are involved in is turned into a partisan fight, and this served the dual purpose of facilitating Bill Clinton???s impeachment and endearing Hillary to the nation. She received some of her best approval ratings yet (her approval peaked at 67% around the time of the scandal). But that wouldn???t stay the case as she departed for New York to run for, and serve, as New York???s Senator. New York is a notoriously corrupt state, and her work there to many implicates her in a number of corruption scandals that reached almost every level of the state???s political structure (ironically enough, major land developers and Wall Street types like Donald Trump and Michael Bloomberg are implicated as well). There???s no one particular scandal that she was involved in (and, in fact, she was a notoriously well-liked and respected Senator because she refused to fall to corruption), but the long history of being around shady stuff only heightened the scrutiny Clinton received. Then she ran for president, and all this stuff came back into the public consciousness as both Republicans like Rudy Giuliani (who was the odds-on favorite to win the nomination) and Democrats like Chris Dodd and Barack Obama (Obama to a lesser extent in the beginning) took her to task on all aspects of her past. Like this year, Hillary was the favorite to win the nomination, and everyone was sure she???d win in a general if she could just beat this one young charismatic Senator named???John Edwards. The primary was long and bruising for Hillary, and many people resolved in their minds that she was some terribly corrupt war monger that stood in the way of real change (sound familiar). But once Obama did get elected, he appointed her Secretary of State and she did an unexpectedly good job. As someone with little foreign policy experience (outside attending state dinners and overheard Oval Office conversations), she held her own immensely well, courting both private praise (Republicans in Congress that now deride her as evil called her one of the nation???s best ever) as well as seeing her approvals reach near-record levels (as you see above, she peaked around 65???66, which is only one point away from her peak).