MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+gRwjcG8+UdQAdv3YfgmQbOFMEVRJ+aP5ydLZD+c1w8-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO1AUJPZ352KRbyWsuOK3dqVc-MwU1O2YQnuLO=722WshqbnCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+gRwjcG8+UdQAdv3YfgmQbOFMEVRJ+aP5ydLZD+c1w8-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:38:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJNfcLY2YYPYqEqMNSoB+FGvsCCCrDuuYWE_MzmQcM0bLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -1.5
X-Spam_score_int: -14
X-Spam_bar: -
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: liberate lojban.org to community
 volunteers, and move the official contents to another website
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

2017-02-20 11:14 GMT+00:00 Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>:
> Using github.com for official repositories can be dangerous since Github is
> not own by LLG.
> I suggest
> 1. still use Github
> 2. make synced backups of all official repositories on Github at servers
> owned by LLG or provided to LLG for free.
>


So you agree to the optional suggestion that requires the motion being
realized. It implies that you agree to the motion. Say "I second!"
I hope this motion makes you really {gleki} because you will become
not being blamed for your abuse of power on the "official" website.

As for backup, the official contents are not very large, and every
member can keep them in one's own computer. Such plural backing-up is
much safer than keeping backups in one place. The official body has no
need to own servers.


>
> As for
>
>> - The official contents exclude records of discussions by the
> community, mailing lists, jbotcan, learning materials by person or the
> community, non-BPFK proposals, Gleki's original research, community
> news, artworks, list of artworks, jbovlaste, parsers, tools, robots,
> arranged official logos, community logos.
>
> I suggest replacing "Gleki's original research" with "original research of
> members" since Gleki is not the only one (but thanks for making Gleki even
> more famous).
>


You are welcome!

Original research of other than Gleki is tagged with "non-official" or
placed in User's page, so there is no need to mention it here. If any
suspicious pages are found, the third condition of the definition "Any
other unclear contents should be defined by discussion" is applied.


>> 2-4. By paying to Github, LLG can create private repositories that are
> visible only to the organization members. This feature may be useful
> for group working like LBCK.
>
> Can you explain why LBCK should be done in private?
>


Proficiency test under construction is not yet an official content,
and therefore it is inappropriate to be put in a public repository of
the official body without any notice.

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members