Received: from localhost ([::1]:51678 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cibRi-0008Nv-5t; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:39:38 -0800 Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.161.179]:35905) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cibRb-0008N3-Aj for llg-members@lojban.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:39:35 -0800 Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v200so1970055ywc.3 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:39:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yEOpDqfqWyYYiUvgiPaUA/61niNM4wIMb8mOFCLjDsU=; b=l+QUHy5/0cYmarE1p4g+MWwHOhjJ2HemHsBPMaynzS2zgQz+T649KbGxW4NyzUpITR Iykm3ZRZEyYFYlOLmlivTyKpvUKO2iJ8KsgmnM31QiaCf6EzFtG4XubxXsrvnkva1fvZ 0ngkMqyvxHBfn8ekoWxXLRi37xWbDddvgYt7koc9XY1JuGLD051n7+sM+rmkAqb7wjeP zRf1JZIjEDksBZcWhlU2heiBgqqG1JAQjfHRPwxTlPIAMQgsg1nP/mz4iy+0webWwOlP 43XxFSkyOuOM+4knCPw2GVuBMGXbvk90xb5IZwMcaox/DgNYkxM2EcFlkwUR96HxiTxV NMNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=yEOpDqfqWyYYiUvgiPaUA/61niNM4wIMb8mOFCLjDsU=; b=r515wJEx5VR1/w9U8QWUgIWKBNUwjvjfiJfns0qH1CfbssoQKHwGAuhf1bUru2Hk4W 4Dm5+onsY7WJ/xPD8MJuZxv7MOz3oCmPtWbl6YmcLBsbmTWQgy7q8eohMHWBZWFN4fZ9 dvVYG30WEOlpureGeFjQNyNeM5NJfN4jJM2M5ZfeKRbhR21S56yZm9PdqBCUAbPS+2iP BDZz01R9TMceZjflDsVuK9CnNYcUKsvolFTl1Kxfq//UXJPdqVEblwqajT3w8NOUNO10 RXqGWIPO8eXYfJ1FOI8tIqDIY+8BddwispODy00AWoVVv7Z27tlw7IN6FrpB71L6VNRx Hk3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nHFkve1NMI+ogis2qq9Z+/2mgJJbn/7z7VBYsqp2H3OFWZQQ3/oIYycGW8lNkXlMgDBRiYkDosEwm7kg== X-Received: by 10.129.56.215 with SMTP id f206mr102815ywa.23.1488263964605; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:39:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.108.69 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:38:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <84FF782F-C682-4563-82B6-8850202416C2@gmail.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:38:44 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2016 Annual Meeting of the Logical Language Group, Inc. - call to order and roll call X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3692449002232231627==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============3692449002232231627== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114d88bcf14b5d05499174d1 --001a114d88bcf14b5d05499174d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I second the nomination of Thomas Porter / cizypij as a member provided that they still want to be a member. 2017-02-28 3:32 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > Oh, I meant to second that too. So, I do so now and vote in favor for it > when the time comes. > > On Feb 27, 2017 19:28, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" wrote= : > >> I apologize for the late response, but I am back from my latest trip, an= d >> would like to remain on the Board. >> >> I would like to second the nomination of Thomas Porter / cizypij as a >> member. >> >> I will follow up shortly with an officer=E2=80=99s report. >> >> =E2=80=94Riley >> >> > On Feb 19, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote= : >> > >> > On 2/5/2017 7:13 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >> >> On 1/23/2017 3:06 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >> >>> Next on the agenda are the minutes from last meeting. Our Secretary >> >>> (mukti) is traveling out of this country for the next week or so, so= I >> >>> will defer that item until he returns. >> >>> >> >>> Next we have reports of Officers and committees. Again, we will hav= e >> to >> >>> wait for mukti to post the Treasurers report after his return. >> >> >> >> I had hoped mukti would be back by now, and would have posted the >> above, >> >> but it seems not to be the case. In order to move the meeting along,= I >> >> will suggest that someone move that we defer these items until the 20= 17 >> >> meeting. >> > >> > mukti is back, but has apparently not had time to post these. Bu ther= e >> has been no motion to defer them to the next meeting. >> > >> > I'm not sure if it is legal, but I guess I can rule from the chair to >> defer to the next meeting, so as to move the meeting forward. I'd prefe= r a >> motion though, and will allow a few days more before I play dictator. >> > >> >> One of mukti's suggestions for expediting future meetings, so that th= ey >> >> don't last for months, is that whereever possible, motions are >> presented >> >> in advance of the (next) meeting and discussed on various forums >> >> (including the members list, but also IRC and whatever else people wa= nt >> >> to try), before they are formally raised at the meeting. >> > >> > This is being discussed, but I don't intend to hold up the meeting >> until that discussion completes, since it isn't really in order at this >> point in the agenda. (But I won't tell people to stop discussing it) >> > >> >> I suspect that >> >> some of the things suggested by the byfy chair in his report would be= st >> >> be discussed in the context of such motions as would support their >> >> implementation. selpa'i, could you prepare such motions, and post th= em >> >> when appropriate. (in the current suggestion, I suspect that we can >> >> have such motions posted as new business, and at the same time tabled >> >> until the next meeting. Or just post them for discussion now while w= e >> >> are still on reports. >> > >> > Not necessarily applicable until new business. >> > >> >>> After we get done with all reports, we will call for new members, an= d >> >>> elect a new Board of Directors. >> >> >> >> It is not clear that all reports that will be made are completed, but >> in >> >> the interests of moving the meeting along, I call for people wishing = to >> >> become members to speak up now, (along with any proposals by others f= or >> >> people not currently present to become members - we will need to get >> >> them to state that they wish to be members, and get them added to thi= s >> >> mailing list). >> > >> > There have been no volunteers or proposals for new members. >> > >> >> I will allow another week for any additional reports, as well as >> motions >> >> regarding deferring of minutes and reports (which motions can be >> >> seconded without waiting for me). Then we will act on any motions as >> >> appropriate and approve those new members. >> > >> > There are no such motions. >> > >> > OK. I will allow up until end of day next Friday (24 Feb) for any >> memberships to be considered prior to the Board. >> > >> > I will also consider all reports that *have* been made so far to have >> been submitted for member acceptance, and they will be considered accept= ed >> without formal motion if there is no objection prior to end of day next >> Friday. >> > >> > In the absence of minutes or other reports or motions deferring them >> until the next meeting by end of day next Friday, I will rule from the >> chair to do so as stated above. >> > >> >> Then Board elections, >> > >> > Nominations and/or volunteers for the new Board are now in order. The >> existing Board can be proposed as a slate if someone would so move, but = I >> would still like each Board member to post and state that they want to >> remain on the Board. The existing Board (informally named) are: lojbab, >> Karen, Curtis, gleki, selpa'i, mukti, and Ali. >> > >> > I would like all such nominations and volunteering to also all be >> posted by end of day Friday. Then when I post next weekend after that >> deadline, we can have the Board election, and then perhaps quickly wrap = up >> the meeting. >> > >> > And my usual: >> > If for whatever reason I have not posted again *by end of day Monday >> (27 Feb)*, >> > I ask the VP to assume the chair and attempt to move the >> > meeting onward, in line with the above and the Bylaw-directed agenda. >> > >> > lojbab >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Llg-members mailing list >> > Llg-members@lojban.org >> > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --001a114d88bcf14b5d05499174d1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I second=C2=A0the nomination of Thomas Porter / cizypij as= a member provided that they still want to be a member.

2017-02-28 3:32 GMT+03:00 Curti= s Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:
Oh, I meant to second that too. So, I= do so now and vote in favor for it when the time comes.

On Feb 27, 2017 19:28, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" <shunpiker@gmail.com= > wrote:
I apolog= ize for the late response, but I am back from my latest trip, and would lik= e to remain on the Board.

I would like to second the nomination of Thomas Porter / cizypij as a membe= r.

I will follow up shortly with an officer=E2=80=99s report.

=E2=80=94Riley

> On Feb 19, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/5/2017 7:13 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>> On 1/23/2017 3:06 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>>> Next on the agenda are the minutes from last meeting.=C2=A0 Ou= r Secretary
>>> (mukti) is traveling out of this country for the next week or = so, so I
>>> will defer that item until he returns.
>>>
>>> Next we have reports of Officers and committees.=C2=A0 Again, = we will have to
>>> wait for mukti to post the Treasurers report after his return.=
>>
>> I had hoped mukti would be back by now, and would have posted the = above,
>> but it seems not to be the case.=C2=A0 In order to move the meetin= g along, I
>> will suggest that someone move that we defer these items until the= 2017
>> meeting.
>
> mukti is back, but has apparently not had time to post these.=C2=A0 Bu= there has been no motion to defer them to the next meeting.
>
> I'm not sure if it is legal, but I guess I can rule from the chair= to defer to the next meeting, so as to move the meeting forward.=C2=A0 I&#= 39;d prefer a motion though, and will allow a few days more before I play d= ictator.
>
>> One of mukti's suggestions for expediting future meetings, so = that they
>> don't last for months, is that whereever possible, motions are= presented
>> in advance of the (next) meeting and discussed on various forums >> (including the members list, but also IRC and whatever else people= want
>> to try), before they are formally raised at the meeting.
>
> This is being discussed, but I don't intend to hold up the meeting= until that discussion completes, since it isn't really in order at thi= s point in the agenda. (But I won't tell people to stop discussing it)<= br> >
>> I suspect that
>> some of the things suggested by the byfy chair in his report would= best
>> be discussed in the context of such motions as would support their=
>> implementation.=C2=A0 selpa'i, could you prepare such motions,= and post them
>> when appropriate.=C2=A0 (in the current suggestion, I suspect that= we can
>> have such motions posted as new business, and at the same time tab= led
>> until the next meeting.=C2=A0 Or just post them for discussion now= while we
>> are still on reports.
>
> Not necessarily applicable until new business.
>
>>> After we get done with all reports, we will call for new membe= rs, and
>>> elect a new Board of Directors.
>>
>> It is not clear that all reports that will be made are completed, = but in
>> the interests of moving the meeting along, I call for people wishi= ng to
>> become members to speak up now, (along with any proposals by other= s for
>> people not currently present to become members - we will need to g= et
>> them to state that they wish to be members, and get them added to = this
>> mailing list).
>
> There have been no volunteers or proposals for new members.
>
>> I will allow another week for any additional reports, as well as m= otions
>> regarding deferring of minutes and reports (which motions can be >> seconded without waiting for me).=C2=A0 Then we will act on any mo= tions as
>> appropriate and approve those new members.
>
> There are no such motions.
>
> OK. I will allow up until end of day next Friday (24 Feb) for any memb= erships to be considered prior to the Board.
>
> I will also consider all reports that *have* been made so far to have = been submitted for member acceptance, and they will be considered accepted = without formal motion if there is no objection prior to end of day next Fri= day.
>
> In the absence of minutes or other reports or motions deferring them u= ntil the next meeting by end of day next Friday, I will rule from the chair= to do so as stated above.
>
>> Then Board elections,
>
> Nominations and/or volunteers for the new Board are now in order.=C2= =A0 The existing Board can be proposed as a slate if someone would so move,= but I would still like each Board member to post and state that they want = to remain on the Board.=C2=A0 The existing Board (informally named) are: lo= jbab, Karen, Curtis, gleki, selpa'i, mukti, and Ali.
>
> I would like all such nominations and volunteering to also all be post= ed by end of day Friday.=C2=A0 Then when I post next weekend after that dea= dline, we can have the Board election, and then perhaps quickly wrap up the= meeting.
>
> And my usual:
> If for whatever reason I have not posted again *by end of day Monday (= 27 Feb)*,
> I ask the VP to assume the chair and attempt to move the
> meeting onward, in line with the above and the Bylaw-directed agenda.<= br> >
> lojbab
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Llg-members mailing list
> Llg-member= s@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo= /llg-members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


--001a114d88bcf14b5d05499174d1-- --===============3692449002232231627== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============3692449002232231627==--