Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cz3Zg-0003Fr-Kb for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:55:52 -0700 Received: from [85.153.239.27] (port=59240 helo=mail.yourstreamingboxspecials.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cz3Zb-0003EK-9H for lojban@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:55:52 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dkim; d=yourstreamingboxspecials.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID; i=tickboxtv@yourstreamingboxspecials.com; bh=Gq8sbCO9rPAXbnxEWfZVOBkTx6A=; b=fA00BKwfCzh9Q8sSPfB85Z+FMbGwf6L9vz+I15fPBH0kG7jXagyAfuz2kUgkaEUMTNgOiPTzLxIx LTVDDdQ3v6tIbx/MhbLTB9JEEeoYZCg2Vuzl8Not5sSbka21Uef3A/CdDQwkzrYjVVN2qL0I1Az1 q4nccRCEYypRUSZLi5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=dkim; d=yourstreamingboxspecials.com; b=z5Z+XgIPxWP735X9Xz801uSBAfCyW4ynICWYzfKN8FwKSmxrHYqF7Ii27goi3COalzszv1bUBBzL nXmI9qzxcP5ZOPoDoXv+1thkzAl4fd8F6HhpAysNURk0q51aAtk7EPoBYdDIv4wdEDUt0enbvmAl tn8/RDi/fzojN0MjxuE=; Received: by mail.yourstreamingboxspecials.com id hu45tu0001gs for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:45:29 -0400 (envelope-from ) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:45:29 -0400 From: TickBoxTV To: Subject: Start streaming ALL your favorites at a fraction of the-cost of cable. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4_1071163225.1492185042241" X-SMTPAPI: {"category": "20170414-115022-099-190"} List-Unsubscribe: Feedback-ID: 20170414115022099190 Message-ID: <0.0.0.0.1D2B546E83AC52E.321DC2@mail.yourstreamingboxspecials.com> X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.0 X-Spam_score_int: 20 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Streaming-Options Get Rid of-Cable & Start Binge-Watching! Dear lojban@lojban.org, Are you fed-up with cable-bills like so many other people? Tear-them up and start streaming ALL of your favorites for a fraction of the-cost! [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: yourstreamingboxspecials.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.8 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ------=_Part_4_1071163225.1492185042241 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Streaming-Options=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 = =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
Get Rid of-Cable & Start Binge-Watching!
=20
3D""

Dear lojban@lojban.org,


Are you fed-up with cable-bills like so m= any other people? Tear-them up and start streaming ALL of your favorites fo= r a fraction of the-cost!

With Tick-Box TV, you'll still be able to = watch all your favorite tv-shows, movies and more and you won't have to put= up with those annoying cable-bills.

Streaming is the new way to wat= ch, and more and more people are getting rid of-cable, why shouldn't you be= next?


Go Here to Get Tick-Box TV Now

 

 

 

&nb= sp;

 

 

 

 

&nb= sp;

 

 

 

 

&nb= sp;

 

 

You can.halt these streamingads-r= ight now if you want.by going-here.
#-_2885 Sanford-Avenue S.W. No.40442.
Grandville.
MlCHlGAN - = #494l8.

 

 

 

 

It'= s finally, almost, happening (again). After years of behind-the-scenes bro= kering, a raft of tech companies are reportedly close to launching new stre= aming services that will allow customers to watch live TV via the Internet.= First, Hulu confirmed that it's working on a live-streaming package expect= ed to include TV mainstays like ESPN, ABC and Fox, costing around $40. Then= , Bloomberg reported that the Google-owned YouTube is aiming to launch its = own online live-TV service sometime in 2017, offering a similar ? skinny bu= ndle? of very popular channels and costing less than a traditional cable pa= ckage. Rumors persist that Apple wants to do the exact same thing. And all = of these services will compete with Dish Network' s Sling TV and Sony' s Pl= ayStation Vue service, early Internet-TV products that launched last year. = Combined, these efforts will likely cause the so-far-niche activity of watc= hing live television channels via the Internet into the mainstream. If lots= of people decide to cut the cord in favor of these new services, the way w= e all watch TV could change dramatically, whether through a cable box, a sa= tellite dish or an Apple TV. Here, we break down who the winners and losers= of the new, live-streamed world are likely to be. Surprise: The reason tec= h companies are scrambling to break into the TV market is because it' s a m= assive money-making opportunity. Globally, television will bring in nearly = half a trillion dollars between customer subscription fees and advertising = revenue by 2019, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers. Companies like Google= and Hulu can tap into both of these money sources, charging people for mon= thly subscriptions while also selling commercials to air during their progr= ams. And because television has yet to be disrupted in the same way as book= s, music and other types of media, a variety of players are still eager to = grab the lion' s share of this huge pool of money. ? There is going to be a= n explosion of smaller-bundle services,? says Rich Greenfield, a media and = tech analyst at BTIG.

Tech-Savvy Consumers Those consumers who are a= ble to keep track of the myriad streaming options available to them will li= kely find ways to save money compared to traditional cable packages. It' s = likely that many of the online-TV services will offer a base bundle that in= cludes a couple dozen very popular channels and then smaller, themed bundle= s centered around topics like sports or kids' entertainment. Sling TV, for = example, offers channels like ESPN, CNN and Disney Channel in its $20 base = package, with small expansion bundles sold for $5 each. (But you'll still h= ave to shell out for Internet access.) Major Television Networks TV network= s have been left flat-footed in the transition to streaming video, unsure w= hether to license all their content to services like Netflix or keep it loc= ked up with traditional pay-TV operators, which are slowly losing subscribe= rs. These new online live-TV products could serve as a promising new revenu= e source. New entrants into the pay-TV world may pay networks affiliate fee= s that are 1.75 times as costly as those paid by Comcast because their user= bases are relatively small, according Erik Brannon, a television analyst a= t IHS Screen Digest. In the case of Hulu, the new service will be especiall= y lucrative for Disney, NBCUniversal and Fox, which jointly own the company= ? It' s money they never had the opportunity to make before,? explains Br= annon. ? This contraction in the total number of pay-TV households . . . ca= n be mitigated for them on the books.? The big cable bundle isn' t going an= ywhere. IHS estimates that the number of households subscribed to tradition= al pay-TV packages will shrink from 99 million to 95 million by 2020, which= is still a big number. But those packages may start to look different.

=

Negotiation standoffs between pay-TV operators and networks are becomin= g more frequent as television ratings decline and networks demand higher fe= es from operators for their content. These days, there' s not always a happ= y ending. When Viacom reached an impasse in 2014 with Suddenlink, a St. Lou= is-based cable operator with more than one million subscribers, the media g= iant' s networks all went dark for Suddenlink subscribers. The customers ca= ught in the middle now no longer have access to Nickelodeon, MTV, and other= big-name channels. Increased instability in the industry could lead to mor= e such standoffs, or cause some smaller cable channels to shutter altogethe= r. The large number of digital competitors also means more must-see TV will= end up on online platforms, including shows that were previously part of t= raditional television. Sesame Street, a PBS mainstay that has long been ava= ilable to any kid with a television set and an antenna, now debuts exclusiv= ely on HBO, which has one of the most expensive streaming services on the m= arket. CBS, meanwhile, is planning to make first-run episodes of its upcomi= ng Star Trek series exclusive to its streaming package. The broadcast netwo= rks and widely viewed cable channels will be fine in the slow transition to= online TV. It' s the little guys that may get squeezed out. If traditional= pay-TV subscribers opt for skinnier bundles en masse, the channels that ar= en' t included in slimmed-down packages will see their subscriber fees star= t to decline and could suffer in ratings as well. Tiny cable networks with = four-digit channel numbers are already being forced to go off the air. ? It= 's the long tail of the basic cable bundle that is most likely to come unde= r pressure,? says Dan Cryan, a media analyst at IHS.

 

=20
=20 3D""/ ------=_Part_4_1071163225.1492185042241--