DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=dkim; d=rollthewheelsnow.com;
 b=C/aa59Dhe2N+ZZ1FZgSHZi3b0mwUJZy2gjm7ZkiU8YBImR4flH+UptPoZbgYLX0favk7rdIn4X8x
   jeFu4lTf7jNH59luK0asUVQUOnjKIN/Ih5BWofuLhoEkqi4nPU2Gna9+xfUsCXl/nXww+sY7HQKj
   pJrRyWRQwCbKpajbTeA=;
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 17:05:32 -0400
From: "Darlene Hanks" <darlene_hanks@rollthewheelsnow.com>
To:   <lojban@lojban.org>
Subject: NBC: Vanna White forces possible cancelation of Wheel
 of Fortune following this incident 03070987
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_436_341080046.1508008524177"
Message-ID: <0.0.0.30.1D345302C53F1D0.1220B71@mail.rollthewheelsnow.com>
X-Spam_score: -1.2
X-Spam_score_int: -11
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_436_341080046.1508008524177
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

NBC

Wheel of Fortune might be finished after this latest
news regarding its popular host Vanna White


http://www.rollthewheelsnow.com/creases-dialysis/396MO862h24Bej66cUxhvLKgFxhvLKgzhkre33


The network is considering making sweeping changes to the show
for the past week even though its still extremely popular


http://www.rollthewheelsnow.com/creases-dialysis/396MO862h24Bej66cUxhvLKgFxhvLKgzhkre33


This is an (adver-tisement) that was sent to you


Choose not to receive these when you tell us on the below page
http://www.rollthewheelsnow.com/9ad8iz6224ZfN66cFxhvLKgFxhvLKgzhkr856/taxiing-Kampuchea
PO Box 159763 PMB 357 LA CA 90024


Cut out your email from our database by submitting your name right here
http://www.rollthewheelsnow.com/abbreviating-effects/7b08K9x22m5n0A66cvxhvLKgFxhvLKgzhkr497
Jan Turick ^ 1201 15Th St N Moorhead Mn 56560-1728


discussions which imbittered the already existing relations, for ten years the king dispensed with a Parliament. The murder of the Duke of Buckingham by Felton brought no alleviation to the situation. In Ireland, Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, ruled with tyrannical power. He was a man of clear mind and of great talent, and his whole efforts were devoted to increasing the power of the king, and so, as he considered, the benefit of the country. In Ireland he had a submissive Parliament, and by the aid of this he raised moneys, and ruled in a manner which, tyrannical as it was, was yet for the benefit of that country. The king had


While the sympathies of the people of England were strongly in favor of their coreligionists upon the Continent, those of James inclined toward Catholicism, and in all matters ecclesiastical he was at variance with his subjects. What caused, if possible, an even deeper feeling of anger than his interference in church matters, was his claim to influence the decisions of the law courts. The pusillanimity of the great mass of the judges hindered them from opposing his outrageous claims, and the people saw with indignation and amazement the royal power becoming infinitely greater and more extended than anything to which Henry VIII. or even Elizabeth had  claim. The negotiations of the king for a marriage between his son and the Infanta of Spain raised the fears


advised by Parliament; that the fort and castles should be disposed of by consent of Parliament; and that no peers should be made but with the consent of both Houses. They demanded also that they should have the power of appointing and dismissing the royal ministers, of naming guardians for the royal , and of virtually controlling military, civil, and religious affairs. As it was clear that these demands went altogether beyond the rights of the Commons, and that if the king submitted to them the power of the country would be solely in their hands, while he himself would become a cipher, he had no course open to him but to refuse assent, and to appeal to the loyal nobility and gentry of the country. It is true that many of these rights have since been


of a king, still more intolerable would it be to be governed by the despotic power of a group of fanatics. The liberty of Englishmen was now as much threatened by the Commons as it had been threatened by the king, and to loyal gentlemen the latter alternative was preferable. Thus there were on both sides earnest and conscientious men who grieved deeply at being forced to draw swords in such a quarrel, and who felt that their choice of sides was difficult in the extreme. Falkland was the typical soldier on the royal side, Hampden on that of the Commons. It is probable that were England divided tomorrow under the same

------=_Part_436_341080046.1508008524177--