Received: from localhost ([::1]:47450 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ePHM3-0006HN-Lz; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:26:27 -0800 Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:39397) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ePHLX-0006FA-Ne for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:25:57 -0800 Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i20so2825313uak.6 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:25:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RfbnVoYYzHynaTMJJTIOofhYektpjOTF+RWBJ4FZ1hQ=; b=nkFuJtaCc38bKJ6NijMgMdgGccmO37h9Xt0q/ktcFtWcncPplIgJp1M62HH1mipapA oXxzTQ10QZcqwuZjixXnmjijx7H9dmiiz1yXK/FB0LNv/nLmBpZ3F00e5qKJPaL+Ff/D lxm5PWfCDWGQrH4WivMHqIjkh3T9QFRfGRuk9odzuCQIvA7Huss/TJzh4zTly+5g47ik Xq3VBXUpUoNfHBGb43YAOyth5nhPG/YMT46BRLx3dcxj5NF2PxfMg0peaUQDdhHgxytT jGDLJc+MmuvUsrAknkkZhiURuHIliclGMFdZSbOH+GqOy1kRdXF8uGjh/DfaVZDmVjfh Rhtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=RfbnVoYYzHynaTMJJTIOofhYektpjOTF+RWBJ4FZ1hQ=; b=pIzGN+8bl4R/q3CVs2UDRSDgUfcob0+6KSjApiPSmHvnLpIcPs5kIFcy/RDX8+B9r9 s6f8W5qw7Qq8SwGUtv72LzJnfPiy7K4D+Vqbg2vG2UvpHPGKQEfLpkVd/1OONPnR9ECQ ib3mUczu7YWqcSj2l6/Np8S/xcz0yShvfolbCfEg7cHJYvC3tYdzwwHO6bjexMrig0f9 49ExDITq1AcP3Fx8DM+ZK6/UuvT1VCeAoKIZlMOX0Yll05wpevz0ZWJ2NHKB8SGhMOco hapZolz7TA8LkBK22d4nG4EKFzDN4A940IPfNB9UEplhNvfcqDuYLosgtj5LuseuQrvq wqdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mI7fpAChdM69ySBn168Y4OFANp6g1Mzj/vaeKkGlwq4vLmjkzfj 3v5lB5myGEuI6lw89VbYDxNP9GByoaLzrBeJrAA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovPTi+Ip3ZhAQPyJmQZKsjytiQyU97EDnOz9iyks3pcKXTf8T451E3sk1V+0cMpjvsMT0mZWu+ASjwueAp2Uvs= X-Received: by 10.159.35.234 with SMTP id 97mr10178064uao.119.1513211148380; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:25:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.112.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:25:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.112.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:25:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8720be6f-2fa8-935c-fa17-907af9df3550@selpahi.de> From: Creative Care Services Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:25:47 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Unfinished Business X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2530245913553298140==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============2530245913553298140== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c03caf0f83155056041ecff" --94eb2c03caf0f83155056041ecff Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe both are unfinished business since they were raised at the last meeting and postponed. The first mentioned is BPFK, so let's discuss that first. I open the floor. Personally I would also rather actually have the discussions rather than pushing them off yet again in the interest of speed as well. . karis. On Dec 13, 2017 16:44, "selpahi" wrote: Are we supposed to discuss BPFK matters under Unfinished Business? Also, what about discussions about the future of the LLG itself? There is plenty to discuss. We are not going to just end this meeting like the last one without having achieved anything. ~~~mi'e la selpa'i --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --94eb2c03caf0f83155056041ecff Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I believe both are unfinished business since they we= re raised at the last meeting and postponed. The first mentioned is BPFK, s= o let's discuss that first. I open the floor. Personally I would also r= ather actually have=C2=A0 the discussions rather than pushing them off yet = again in the interest of speed as well.=C2=A0



. karis.=C2=A0

On Dec 13, 2017 16:44, "selpahi" <selpahi@selpahi.de> wrote:
Are we supposed to discuss BPFK matters = under Unfinished Business?

Also, what about discussions about the future of the LLG itself?

There is plenty to discuss.

We are not going to just end this meeting like the last one without having = achieved anything.

~~~mi'e la selpa'i

---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members

--94eb2c03caf0f83155056041ecff-- --===============2530245913553298140== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============2530245913553298140==--