MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADbAA4U3-P1cF4u=S50RCiWc7ncs-bfsuyNvutANhBQZV9PbqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADbAA4Uv420mBUBjeihFdqxWfzbC4s5S5JTRVRpQgiy9Y6FH9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+h=qtWw6CaGutQAQg9kgwtyy45WqOhko8kkdyVeA+bKxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFoHDTf1a6GZu0eo3qaXmK7i8wsg_jrwZA8VXWmiPwX8gKjY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <7074953.2veMK8YGUJ@caracal>
 <CADbAA4U=t-y1ef=zoQjjTP7Wm6U-B_LBV0rsEQTOx5RscQq+WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+hZ=tb9+ZKKWPeaMOUGKvKLX6OR68NoMR7t7Y_r=SerpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4VtZPXqYpvDVyu0k-9eDy53aJ9oss17Gsfg+p0JSL21Fg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+jEJH-gcZieaf7cGfhDxOKweNG3sUdB5_HNTDoGTm780Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4W-5-VMexAeQvMjNiMCK+X1ypd3_ObZSnTJOxQkg1zx1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO1AUJO36S_7JBoKfou3LGdhMzUmLQC1GNBESf8QHePvUULY5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4U3-P1cF4u=S50RCiWc7ncs-bfsuyNvutANhBQZV9PbqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 04:47:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJOo-uBWy43jemJp5Ujed4O9b+q7VTq5v3RexvriWoyW8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -1.5
X-Spam_score_int: -14
X-Spam_bar: -
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Unfinished Business: BPFK
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org
Sender: "Llg-members" <llg-members-bounces@lojban.org>

2017-12-26 1:15 GMT+00:00 Creative Care Services <comcaresvcs@gmail.com>:
> I'm sorry, but you misunderstood me, Guskant. I wasn't saying that local or
> online meetings _need_ official support, though telling the Board, maybe
> afterwards with pictures, would be wonderful. Advertising and presentation
> materials  doesn't either, though it would not be a bad idea to make sure
> the materials specify what is official and what is not official language
> details.
>
> What I was saying is that monetary support may be available to allow
> presentations at pay events, or other circumstances with submission of a
> written proposal for evaluation by the Board. This was discussed in order to
> allow presentations at scientific, linguistic, and science fiction
> conferences and conventions when a small financial contribution means
> attendance of the presentor is possible when otherwise it would not, or
> similar situations.
>
> .karis.
>

2017-12-26 1:42 GMT+00:00 Creative Care Services <comcaresvcs@gmail.com>:
>
>
> We are taking about increasing awareness beyond where it is now. This
> requires us to look to alternative methods and variations on what has
> already been done.
>

I see. Under the conditions that you meant the official support for
those events were possible but not necessary, your post was not a
defense against Selpahi's suggestion for dissolving the LLG. Then I
don't have much to say about your ideas. My intention was to support
Selpahi's suggestion, not to discuss possible business.


>
> Two points :
>
> 1) Dissolution of LLG is much too important to discuss mixed in and among
> other topics. It will be addressed during this meeting, but not until the
> other issues are addressed.
>

OK, I will wait for the topic for dissolving the LLG will come up as a
main issue.


> 2) Guskant, your concerns were addressed last winter in an open meeting you
> attended. I understand you are not happy with the results of that
> discussion, however that is a different issue.
>
> .karis.
>

Do you talk about the pieces of evidence for the LLG is dead? If so, I
would like to confirm that those facts cannot be negated no matter
whether I am happy with the results. It is a fact that we have not yet
published any official reply to the open letter to the LLG that was
posted two years ago. It is also a fact that we achieved nothing for
resolving the problems that I posted for these two years.

mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members