Received: from [::1] (port=46138 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eUrBX-0003ZZ-MV; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:42:39 -0800 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:41008) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eUrB1-0003XT-Ij for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:42:08 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id g75so47740632wme.0 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:42:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M1dqYkdjz6FQdtTUssd2xk4Uy/eUduuAaewhPiSP5sU=; b=SMpbRh86yRuxKM2eQytoqK7B395h1/7GD9KDhqYIKfQQFO+GYsxhdsmeBnyO8vnXlk 66o0hBxRTppjAH+isD+wU4141r7915TA39RBCqx33pulKi7g07qapWOfJGdGAl8juYRB hEj4rxNAe6wM4Ld34FUkb21hcQyUD/eai7Rz1txlTSWJNC615w26suwkDOL2zUfj20pd GKWjgayXIO5jhRz1UfHEzgAYrj0FWO6seYYjpZMRKsGUM58sGkUTHjFocQ5MlExtMXUD aM9xWPneoIIy32RUvcze91hylPqYHfF21uMOmSWfRNl40PHiIREO6tgSUcRne7WMilkH 8BWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=M1dqYkdjz6FQdtTUssd2xk4Uy/eUduuAaewhPiSP5sU=; b=b5ux4nHrbx4H7loXfs88fVjWvDYsXFeTzoEQhtHI43J4eGIb1Frn72UFIgaMrI2YwW g75KvGvab0ohiVKcGvGRXgphZU3rBLK5ZMnJv2o4/mMGwRopiyggocEBKsMjoGKvDs19 by1DJEhhDrf/aqyN4emliCOGCKB2gfAmdYkouIEnPzNuvyt1dB1YKJpZjREmO0PxDX/t XaG0b/+Fg/BoePZ+YVADNOj/2skrrER7I0LczBOiHIAA0mF/Za2E/PNFO4caMRWn09BQ hBBHvYsC9+GiKstewvfMHrn3HhgOrdYUqzKOnrzUHuqgg3hpcn/1rtvGpGRNYM2xjUKf FCMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLZv2LgPmOU49Jc4cksq+gL7aLLQJ4eg1mSQzgfFN224RHjIySd 8wHKv2+3LJFEUOJRytRnjRz/zP1Tt+oSTmJl+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouOtA89zrpGjz1OYFCd8Qlok4yZmMJb4z9HJ9TAo7kWscEIQETQFmY/3oJl2G7Bsgq0XQwl90uzBjaJQM+Ci8g= X-Received: by 10.80.158.196 with SMTP id a62mr43742832edf.307.1514540521029; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:42:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.173.219 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:41:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:41:20 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Concerning Unofficial Social Media Presences X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3073407464357875536==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============3073407464357875536== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c19b976c1080b05617771fa" --94eb2c19b976c1080b05617771fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2017-12-29 11:06 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > I propose (not quite as a motion) that the LLG adopt an official policy > that the LLG or some body constituted by it for such purpose search for and > monitor social media or blog platforms, accounts, pages, profiles, groups, > communities, bots, etc. (hereafter called "entities") which in any way > whatsoever relate to, promote, or use Lojban or other LLG-adopted logical > languages and which are not clearly human, personal, non-promoting, or > unofficial - and that such a body requests such entities to prominently > display a disclaimer stating that they are unofficial and not endorsed by > the LLG. > I support this motion. I second this motion. I approve of this motion. > > (I do not think that we can enforce such requests, just make them. But > having an official policy about addressing them may be good and gives us > some moral 'standing') > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --94eb2c19b976c1080b05617771fa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2017-12-29 11:06 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gma= il.com>:
= I propose (not quite as a motion) that the LLG adopt an official policy tha= t the LLG or some body constituted by it for such purpose search for and mo= nitor social media or blog platforms, accounts, pages, profiles, groups, co= mmunities, bots, etc. (hereafter called "entities") which in any = way whatsoever relate to, promote, or use Lojban or other LLG-adopted logic= al languages and which are not clearly human, personal, non-promoting, or u= nofficial - and that such a body requests such entities to prominently disp= lay a disclaimer stating that they are unofficial and not endorsed by the L= LG.

I support this motion.
= I second this motion.
I approve of this motion.

=C2=A0

(I do not think that we can enforce= such requests, just make them. But having an official policy about address= ing them may be good and gives us some moral 'standing')=C2=A0

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


--94eb2c19b976c1080b05617771fa-- --===============3073407464357875536== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============3073407464357875536==--