Received: from localhost ([::1]:52012 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eVJzS-0006Bt-AH; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:28:06 -0800 Received: from mail-yb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:41882) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eVJyw-00069l-12 for llg-members@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:27:34 -0800 Received: by mail-yb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o84so17904134yba.8 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:27:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2F+SFYhYJYNEBdK33Nh+qW7CCbC/kvc+zyFByFAgiKQ=; b=sAgXq9JREWQjcEsZee/VAUPRI+GyKm5K77Q+1CvDxssFYH+v437p+imOkujlCQB3OK 103Kqi83EDt3SfxUUpu5fbeFEU6IOgvbuB0rxj2vIXBGjgV2bL3V7SATwX8pVAMk2nUj RjqqBcwA0p8ufjjPchXyn/1iggC398AMy0vtQj98Z6/3Nkt7n0CBhs1lZ7UsK0n7xB34 W6pZYOcRTfW1P7UaMl9ZQbLY0g9KWPKcGC+RvD32HcY9ySN+uv0zzXs+hAC35DTGzgiN bu1eK2KvleKwOrgsyZ3VJ50Dx8k4duoLd7typ68DMBBVGvOmkP+3gmG0Y3ejEbE0hyad BBqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2F+SFYhYJYNEBdK33Nh+qW7CCbC/kvc+zyFByFAgiKQ=; b=RobrlRRiSJXku7X8HORcpq+NSLeP0yFUI3dZ8f54Nb2SFIS6nRE0QUhZGWOEpZZs+O hSfgK5p0aX3B6iOxU6yF+/TdQ6h37on6FIgv4l2YXQ3lwlW3IO2iEdr1oYhVpfB1kKvK kP440AE6eeMVOttk0ZnXwSXA752S+IXzvbp7ZG4FVUsq61Vj4SFtyOwd6uctX6PAfOdX Pvs1oNjYqTCKBKmnerGHwwLCfrr7ItN+9NaVIuQfro4JvQ/9Mbywrei32phOF84jQW01 fo8DpFdMiL8lV2ZLfFVwA7v7SvNgHGo3a+iQRe66dyGpb8mzE/3I5XVD+GG99kOzqGEg Jn7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKWa4zOstSJ0ekB9Yr8Gjhk+ufw7YP3Lro3gBQOTx52gkq7Xrbd Btvcinhm93l98pBjPtGB2mi9YJ1/et/bhaGGqL4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosEaLHGYTW/df6uEvk4+P1PUyQkh0DC3q/JLtAjkIY6G264aH3C82+XiAMLZkh1ykn9Lt4ovnrz9vgCuRT8sx4= X-Received: by 10.37.176.131 with SMTP id f3mr5710371ybj.431.1514651247379; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:27:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.135.9 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.135.9 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:27:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Curtis Franks Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:27:26 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Concerning Unofficial Social Media Presences X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4458247042660403086==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============4458247042660403086== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e4c068f0bd905619139c2" --f403045e4c068f0bd905619139c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Actually, I so move (officially). I take it that Gleki's second still applies (since he seconded the wording verbatim as a motion). However, if the official recordkeeping would prefer it, one may count Gleki's message here as moving/officially making the suggestion and this message from me as the second for the motion. On Dec 29, 2017 03:06, "Curtis Franks" wrote: > I propose (not quite as a motion) that the LLG adopt an official policy > that the LLG or some body constituted by it for such purpose search for and > monitor social media or blog platforms, accounts, pages, profiles, groups, > communities, bots, etc. (hereafter called "entities") which in any way > whatsoever relate to, promote, or use Lojban or other LLG-adopted logical > languages and which are not clearly human, personal, non-promoting, or > unofficial - and that such a body requests such entities to prominently > display a disclaimer stating that they are unofficial and not endorsed by > the LLG. > > (I do not think that we can enforce such requests, just make them. But > having an official policy about addressing them may be good and gives us > some moral 'standing') > --f403045e4c068f0bd905619139c2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Actually, I so move (officially). I take it that Gleki= 9;s second still applies (since he seconded the wording verbatim as a motio= n). However, if the official recordkeeping would prefer it, one may count G= leki's message here as moving/officially making the suggestion and this= message from me as the second for the motion.

On Dec 29, 2017 03:06, "Curtis Fran= ks" <curtis.w.franks@g= mail.com> wrote:
I propose (not quite as a motion) that the LLG adopt = an official policy that the LLG or some body constituted by it for such pur= pose search for and monitor social media or blog platforms, accounts, pages= , profiles, groups, communities, bots, etc. (hereafter called "entitie= s") which in any way whatsoever relate to, promote, or use Lojban or o= ther LLG-adopted logical languages and which are not clearly human, persona= l, non-promoting, or unofficial - and that such a body requests such entiti= es to prominently display a disclaimer stating that they are unofficial and= not endorsed by the LLG.

(I d= o not think that we can enforce such requests, just make them. But having a= n official policy about addressing them may be good and gives us some moral= 'standing')
--f403045e4c068f0bd905619139c2-- --===============4458247042660403086== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============4458247042660403086==--