MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7323409f-da23-0d8b-a2ec-e7547a37781e@selpahi.de>
References: <CADbAA4XZMNg7zr44wtw1AsdrgYjyz+Adz2Ro37UqxyzU4qQVvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4Wd6YJgrBhyLP7ZkbWaB3mtoGRw03mGW_ze1Gcik2DEVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4WQ+1Ln-DaewQu31vfRokhX_YrjCCNnxSFqRhj36LcivA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4XzEbLecBWgHWJeej=BPMKNSst6Stcis8RhM1eajM4wPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4W0_zBqZhAdNeLT3kSwLW1gXGRf0ZD83aA8508eP4TUAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4VhJkVGefcn1y7grct-xV=cwrWvBhJkSFCaEda9AZJsMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4Xgi8C7s7p=LW3uSP+je+Ffp24FowrpZ3xEMhXOHDaCgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4WhgBbqUP-XOOwM1P+B_Y5kEeSoWWNc0d_8a0kqvA8R7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4X4mbJ3W7DVBMFy0jiCQC=D0HSdjR5BU1Cq0zDkOdtyxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4XmYv2vad55nVrQfSiC8RxD4r8THkZqe0Y+444z_x+v0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4XtfoBMhpO0Un4C32Q1KkR4y7U6-RwhZr+t80sbk1V8cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4WtDx=6aFRtF7WjxdcAs0N83BqA2GBCQgcosxMRsnPA3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4WTn5Omgx+w4kA+voGnqDOAQqQmstpQeu9Vrntfz28g1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADbAA4UZtQCmqJ_Q_x+Rz1HBdqn9L62se8-vC9cHgj7kinqVpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <7323409f-da23-0d8b-a2ec-e7547a37781e@selpahi.de>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 22:30:33 +0900
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJOfx7su2=QtU34PPrtdF-dv+sRahy0gonRkVDJLPxuVVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: -1.5
X-Spam_score_int: -14
X-Spam_bar: -
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Unfinished Business: BPFK procedures
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

2018-01-01 3:50 GMT+09:00 selpahi <selpahi@selpahi.de>:
>
> guskant expressed the following (on the main list):
>>
>>  I think the problem is caused by the structure of the committee.
>
>
> (and I would like to hear from her what she thinks could be improved about
> the structure of the committee)
>

The discussions in BPFK sometimes stop in midway. Such discussions are
buried under simple Questions and Answers about meaning of words that
do not directly produce any progress of the BPFK documents, and never
restarted.

In order to obtain results from those discussions, it will be
effective to create rules of the process of discussion and the roles
of participants. I suggest the following rules, but any ideas of
improvement are welcome.


Roles.
1. Proposer.
1.1. Every member of BPFK has right to be a proposer at any time.
1.2. The proposer creates a draft of definitions with usage examples
of words and phrases, or a draft of modification to the formal
grammar.
1.3. The proposer submits to the scheduler the draft with priority of
discussion.

2. Scheduler.
2.1. A scheduler is nominated by the chair.
2.2. The scheduler receives from proposers a draft of proposal with
priority of discussion.
2.3. The scheduler controls the order of proposals to be discussed,
and arranges the schedule of discussion considering the priority
suggested by the proposer.

3. Chair.
3.1. A chair is elected by the members of BPFK.
3.2. The chair calls for discussions and polls, and declares the decision.


Process.
1. A proposer submits to the scheduler a draft of proposal with
priority of discussion.

2. The scheduler decides the date of beginning discussion of the
proposal considering the priority suggested by the proposer.

3. Every discussion should be concluded in one month.
3.1. If members cannot reach an agreement in one month, the chair
should call for a poll. All the members including the chair and the
scheduler have right of voting.
3.2. The poll should be closed in one week.
3.3. If two or more alternative items obtain the most and equal number
of ballots, no decision is declared. The proposer has right of putting
the draft of proposal, modified or not, back to the scheduler for
rearranging the schedule of discussion.

4. In the case other than 3.3 above, the chair should declare the
decision of BPFK in one week after obtaining the result of the
discussion and the poll if any.

5. Any users of Lojban who have troubles with the decision of BPFK
have right of joining the BPFK and submitting to the scheduler their
own draft of proposal with priority of discussion.

mi'e la guskant

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members