Received: from [::1] (port=34944 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXMA6-0006Ms-Lq; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:11:30 -0800 Received: from bezitopo.org ([45.55.162.231]:39972 helo=marozi.bezitopo.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXM9a-0006Lx-Mu for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:10:59 -0800 Received: from bezitopo.org (cpe-174-109-123-133.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.123.133]) by marozi.bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD0DD5FAF4 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 02:10:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6811EDD7 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 02:10:55 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: llg-members@lojban.org Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 02:10:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4734149.Ac4Tda036i@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-104-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion proposal - Unofficialness Disclaimer X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On Friday, January 5, 2018 1:46:41 AM EST Creative Care Services wrote: > Ok, with multiple seconds it is necessary to clarify which motion we will > be voting on and whether at least one second is specifically for that > motion. > > I therefore am restating what the first motion was : > > Curtis moved that, " I move that: All non-official pages or content on *. > lojban.org must contain a disclaimer stating, at least, that the website is > owned and managed by voluntary people, and that the marked contents are not > necessarily harmonized with the official design of Lojban and may not > reflect, let alone perfectly comply with, official specifications of the > same." > > Is there a second for this only? I second this. Pierre -- loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members