Received: from [::1] (port=35498 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXMjf-0007tw-TP; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:48:15 -0800 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:42342) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXMj9-0007rq-TE for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:47:44 -0800 Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z132so1477387ywd.9 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:47:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kED1LgJ5bDqc6gUU/m4gi44qlNAq75cf0MS4vTXOFr8=; b=etI0OFn7zLto3mb5fClSxRK8rH5S58DNW09/H0+44csTtyswOSZG2O/2YqP3wJbUpq tVorr14xFOaQdRk9cIp13t+AbhR7RKLICqbk2+YzdZAhX+q0zXcX2Jb7Nk9s9ehi7rzd ocDmXAIWKpzZPXa+GaZcyLScEJhFrgaTWcMWgT6zm9aWO+dPbjpIsV3C+lxmUxs+FKc1 ZsLPQ/hrFKznNlu4BH9OEb6nSdDW7nnFiRvNsUg24dqiLRjwovwHNGf4GTVonyGbc/tL 1fw3laiMQ/D2v2oh1NB5FNd9cJLK/bkmk9NRX3lpR0i/j1AKzDJmjQAcbi1TsNeHWHGb qM0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=kED1LgJ5bDqc6gUU/m4gi44qlNAq75cf0MS4vTXOFr8=; b=IAacdTnpyhDT2AAmPMSh7ZqRipvSNS8uVJmoK2l1yl0MIIypBGOiAPcsLg3TSiPUpL hufd0zCq4JibAHH43zkwgqyRPdPxJXfYrd1DkWmmYZoaOq5VI7ohGlG9gTowWJ1Gf+c+ 7Zs9BrF53BKnpgIMtMiLUv5v3zkGJL/7MUZeC9YIetd2JFpNRwYqzQ3eHlf+Aj7mBdyn O98bWMxUBVbgSmjpzr0LOSg9/PuTNU+zNB06vk+lMC1l420f/nsfY/O2+J7LuzKhwTru tBWWK9Vh2ODYPEjljZ03Ly7NaT0n81hM2OD/9GvLXzqJf3r2lWZTq1swwwdVRELd5xkF eM4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIW5Weda6mEtkBnZKcHv4aFzwUNQk9nqaoCsnml37VVCZI2x1TT pBrC0YfQijthIZ1TjlrTZjWjcE81hTUOPCtHsyo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot9NZWvo14bDWbAhUkIvEX8OxceEb74V/ksd0YdHMgm4AkfZKpH8gD7UX3BGzTVC43KJuoykmaMbCJoXAtHThU= X-Received: by 10.13.245.69 with SMTP id e66mr1972072ywf.268.1515138457185; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:47:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.135.9 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:47:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.135.9 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:47:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Curtis Franks Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 02:47:36 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Mailing list subscription X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1253403329544069824==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============1253403329544069824== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0885be86b457056202a9ce" --94eb2c0885be86b457056202a9ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I meant that they are not entitled to remain private from us, I claim. On Jan 5, 2018 02:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" wrote: > > > 2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > >> I do not think that there would be privacy concerns in doing so, for >> several reasons, but I am not sure that it really matters or that we should >> comb through it (particularly right now). I am more inclined to just give >> them the benefit of the doubt. >> > > They can read our messages and these are my privacy concerns. > > > >> On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki Arxokuna" >> wrote: >> >>> There are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list, which is far more >>> than the urrent members + candidate members. I'm sure some of them are just >>> silent spammers. Should I post all the addresses here so that we decide who >>> is eligible and who is not? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > --94eb2c0885be86b457056202a9ce Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I meant that they are not entitled to remain private from= us, I claim.

On Jan 5, 2018 02:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:


2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03= :00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:
I do not think that there wo= uld be privacy concerns in doing so, for several reasons, but I am not sure= that it really matters or that we should comb through it (particularly rig= ht now). I am more inclined to just give them the benefit of the doubt.

They can read our messages and these are= my privacy concerns.



On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com= > wrote:
<= span>
There are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list,= which is far more than the urrent members + candidate members. I'm sur= e some of them are just silent spammers. Should I post all the addresses he= re so that we decide who is eligible and who is not?

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members



_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members

--94eb2c0885be86b457056202a9ce-- --===============1253403329544069824== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============1253403329544069824==--