Received: from [::1] (port=36044 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXNOb-00016c-9J; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:30:33 -0800 Received: from mail-vk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:36803) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXNO5-00015W-FF for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:30:02 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id s139so2763577vkb.3 for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:30:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xvBfqXcZKKGPrL+Z4gE7FYFeI3Q7LKPjUcVN50THyss=; b=aV95sCrZ8DVbl97cx8DasXq1jj0rbgNyrNVIDTNcJPH1oReFFcyYDKhMaI2XmCNG5l 32/eOGT1D3P76cC8pE6zTRbjEHOTqOCHeAtXogn9MWp7heacIEQ1sQXv/w1EV9ZBlmv5 60kAIpZJV+Pr9IpVJxUqqiWUDBIqXzxjIWdW4dDLKh9FBvythTHuDkdr+xoiRdJByvRJ YCn4HQ9W2a0D2IhiP89Dmsgc0Pmco1NhfMio/1VqjZDStHWr5gvzRLJuQYw7mMLr5byF T93PLglwdeGynYiXkGM4z/GRY0F6XG5rbXOi6cLO7AK1Nxz8SsZOu7N+bQq6a0Ic10G8 5BVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=xvBfqXcZKKGPrL+Z4gE7FYFeI3Q7LKPjUcVN50THyss=; b=ih3SISsgCCvYqKjfaZPKXOj9WEYNslw+KUWC3MSY4WSXf9HP2vDwuDdnfeKdIo30dP eXkbkwB+U2F2w/DAT7fTPST+S7yE9yeQB/zrdBSgfa/rWFshspJThhOsSzdTiP2/ecFH tLYSSHJjgfW0KKPdAkmaU30Cjy4eXG2Riz6jI5BL3+VBxZAwwvxhzabv3Nt94B1a4142 kUZ0QD+yyJwNbt6UqgdbIbZEypI6a1Rfx+FnRWpBhw4bHz5uf6DoC1433RMLnC8LcrPA y3MHvyLgntUG+/rH6Eh9bxifelI9FDOkGIUeMMG5TyKjoaYzHPtqxKwwsLc9VJnWcHgM uvog== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJGoS5LNtuvFIVOjBVTYmoviGYS5W03MZ3CS8vP1uDmeqxB9J2S VhjsUEwP5EOpJa7xm/j5HCHJtuvDL9OloaQl0Hs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouplUusCWcxiFbsW/I02pvHEQahaOq+ZdIA4W93vZmMxhzEjTp0iM9tr05BISR5CKh4sCWmSCfj+3BTG3dZBF0= X-Received: by 10.31.5.1 with SMTP id 1mr2121505vkf.59.1515140994076; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:29:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.27.18 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 00:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.27.18 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 00:29:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Creative Care Services Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 03:29:53 -0500 Message-ID: To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Mailing list subscription X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6295432637242961609==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============6295432637242961609== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143f268bc95fb056203406a" --001a1143f268bc95fb056203406a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I understand that there are people receiving these messages who are probably not interested in passivity, or at least following, or discussions. Because we are in the midst of multiple active conversations I ask that any attempts to cull the list occur outside the meeting. In the meatime, and to prepare for that effort, would each person who i wants to be actively involved in any capacity (posting, following discussions, or whatever) please send a private email to me within 10 days. That will give us the information we need when culling is carried out. .karis. comcaresvcs@gmail.com On Jan 5, 2018 02:48, "Curtis Franks" wrote: I meant that they are not entitled to remain private from us, I claim. On Jan 5, 2018 02:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" wrote: > > > 2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > >> I do not think that there would be privacy concerns in doing so, for >> several reasons, but I am not sure that it really matters or that we should >> comb through it (particularly right now). I am more inclined to just give >> them the benefit of the doubt. >> > > They can read our messages and these are my privacy concerns. > > > >> On Jan 5, 2018 01:47, "Gleki Arxokuna" >> wrote: >> >>> There are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list, which is far more >>> than the urrent members + candidate members. I'm sure some of them are just >>> silent spammers. Should I post all the addresses here so that we decide who >>> is eligible and who is not? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Llg-members mailing list >>> Llg-members@lojban.org >>> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Llg-members mailing list >> Llg-members@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Llg-members mailing list > Llg-members@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > > _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --001a1143f268bc95fb056203406a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I understand that there are people receiving these m= essages who are probably not interested in passivity, or at least following= , or discussions. Because we are in the midst of multiple active conversati= ons I ask that any attempts to cull the list occur outside the meeting. In = the meatime, and to prepare for that effort, would each person who i wants = to be actively involved in any capacity (posting, following discussions, or= whatever) please send a private email to me within 10 days. That will give= us the information we need when culling is carried out.=C2=A0

.karis.=C2=A0



On Jan 5, 2018 02:48, "Cur= tis Franks" <curtis.w.= franks@gmail.com> wrote:
I meant that they are not entitled to remain priv= ate from us, I claim.

On Jan 5, 2018 02:24, "Gleki Arxo= kuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

<= br>
2018-01-05 10:18 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:
I do not think that there would be privacy concern= s in doing so, for several reasons, but I am not sure that it really matter= s or that we should comb through it (particularly right now). I am more inc= lined to just give them the benefit of the doubt.
They can read our messages and these are my privacy concerns.<= /div>



On Jan 5, 2018 01:4= 7, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
= There are 48 email addresses subscribed to this list, which is far more tha= n the urrent members + candidate members. I'm sure some of them are jus= t silent spammers. Should I post all the addresses here so that we decide w= ho is eligible and who is not?

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members



_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@loj= ban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-= members


--001a1143f268bc95fb056203406a-- --===============6295432637242961609== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============6295432637242961609==--