Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fQsKe-0007BP-MZ for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 03:39:52 -0700 Received: from [92.38.130.13] (port=42837 helo=tule.paiinrelf.bid) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <3025-4962-348178-790-lojban=lojban.org@mail.paiinrelf.bid>) id 1fQsJe-00078h-Me for lojban@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 03:38:51 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=paiinrelf.bid; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=contact@paiinrelf.bid; bh=aq6AYFA3Vc1NPFA1PAVOd+YRLFk=; b=b9lcf9bHm3yZHFhtHPzhKuAmWipnsl82XJ9L4hXlDVI4V+fMT+viwPiZ2YpjgsmtOhqprKaP71PH fju1Vl58DHAoHknjJ7CyMJGBRbQu+RoLNkru1Yeu1xOTNNIgpzTDYMACbA52SYHnRcX9toVIyB7j rO740XbDKThxdnkZzZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=paiinrelf.bid; b=FRH2iXt1q60f5ItJFEVI9R+tUsk8WmzYYXYqxPt8A7RASLXPFYYQ1EBkVIhTZnv0XZKcGYL0OxMQ 4jM4HLTIMig9mlTmedrGKXlEvIxcOowX0cRN3k99kgwTjl2+qn+bGxhjImvdCbHNA9Df6k+xQ6XX w7b8OReBMyIuQqyJbEc=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="8687442de12ef52c2666a92360777af8_1362_55012" Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:38:41 +0200 From: "Natural Pain Pill" Reply-To: "Natural Pain Pill" Subject: New Studies Show This Breakthrough Pill Has Incredible Benefits To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.2 X-Spam_score_int: 22 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: New Studies Show This Breakthrough Pill Has Incredible Benefits http://paiinrelf.bid/dUHMxjE4WA1dnVQ6ezsu3mO5C3xM6WjQlMyf6ac-mFywikQ_348178_1362_56ce9746_0300 http://paiinrelf.bid/9nDdrkupzip_DbBu62870X9Z0dB1_6YbL_d3H-G07gSxiRGS_348178_1362_92160ca3_0300 Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5001] 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --8687442de12ef52c2666a92360777af8_1362_55012 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit New Studies Show This Breakthrough Pill Has Incredible Benefits http://paiinrelf.bid/dUHMxjE4WA1dnVQ6ezsu3mO5C3xM6WjQlMyf6ac-mFywikQ_348178_1362_56ce9746_0300 http://paiinrelf.bid/9nDdrkupzip_DbBu62870X9Z0dB1_6YbL_d3H-G07gSxiRGS_348178_1362_92160ca3_0300 The lack of geographic isolation as a definitive barrier between sympatric species has yielded controversy among ecologists, biologists, and zoologists regarding the validity of the term. As such, researchers have long debated the conditions under which sympatry truly applies, especially with respect to parasitism. Because parasitic organisms often inhabit multiple hosts during a life cycle, evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr stated that internal parasites existing within different hosts demonstrate allopatry, not sympatry. Today, however, many biologists consider parasites and their hosts to be sympatric (see examples below). Conversely, zoologist Michael J. D. White considered two populations sympatric if genetic interbreeding was viable within the habitat overlap. This may be further specified as sympatry occurring within one deme; that is, reproductive individuals must be able to locate one another in the same population in order to be sympatric.Others question the ability of sympatry to result in complete speciation: until recently, many researchers considered it nonexistent, doubting that selection alone could create disparate, but not geographically separated, species. In 2003, biologist Karen McCoy suggested that sympatry can act as a mode of speciation only when "the probability of mating between two individuals depend on their genotypes, [and the genes are] dispersed throughout the range of the population during the period of reproduction". In essence, sympatric speciation does require very strong forces of natural selection to be acting on heritable traits, as there is no geographic isolation to aid in the splitting process. Yet, recent research has begun to indicate that sympatric speciation is not as uncommon as was once assumed. --8687442de12ef52c2666a92360777af8_1362_55012 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


 
un_sub_scribe_Here





  The lack of geographic isolation as a definitive barrier between sympatric species has yielded controversy among ecologists, biologists, and zoologists regarding the validity of the term. As such, researchers have long debated the conditions under which sympatry truly applies, especially with respect to parasitism. Because parasitic organisms often inhabit multiple hosts during a life cycle, evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr stated that internal parasites existing within different hosts demonstrate allopatry, not sympatry. Today, however, many biologists consider parasites and their hosts to be sympatric (see examples below). Conversely, zoologist Michael J. D. White considered two populations sympatric if genetic interbreeding was viable within the habitat overlap. This may be further specified as sympatry occurring within one deme; that is, reproductive individuals must be able to locate one another in the same population in order to be sympatric.Others question the ability of sympatry to result in complete speciation: until recently, many researchers considered it nonexistent, doubting that selection alone could create disparate, but not geographically separated, species. In 2003, biologist Karen McCoy suggested that sympatry can act as a mode of speciation only when "the probability of mating between two individuals depend on their genotypes, [and the genes are] dispersed throughout the range of the population during the period of reproduction". In essence, sympatric speciation does require very strong forces of natural selection to be acting on heritable traits, as there is no geographic isolation to aid in the splitting process. Yet, recent research has begun to indicate that sympatric speciation is not as uncommon as was once assumed.
--8687442de12ef52c2666a92360777af8_1362_55012--