Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36394 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h6Nml-0004IM-RH; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:43 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net ([68.230.241.215]:37525) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h6Nmi-0004I8-6Q for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:42 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.28 201-2260-151-171-20160122) with ESMTP id <20190319230434.HCYW20542.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net> for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:04:34 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=EIKyLGRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=hPLMxoGtOG+680QmjsLyHQ==:117 a=hPLMxoGtOG+680QmjsLyHQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=Ey1nsrDV_S7iov3fDE4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=lojbab@cox.net To: llg-members@lojban.org References: From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: <72106f86-534f-6c8a-5011-bf69c49d0577@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:04:43 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Running of the meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 3/18/2019 8:00 AM, And Rosta wrote: > Would it be possible to run the meeting in such a way as to separate > business pertaining to Lojban from business pertaining to logical > language? I resumed/retained membership of the LLG because of my > interest in the latter; the business of the meeting has been entirely > concerned with the former; I on principle intend to abstain from the > former (because I have no stake in it); and it is pretty onerous to > monitor what is happening in the meeting just in case it comes to any > item of business pertaining to logical language. (It's not that I > suppose any item of business pertaining to logical language is at all > likely; rather it's that AFAIK no other organization purports to be > dedicated to loglangs, so someone with a significant interest in > loglangs ends up here by default.) > > One helpful change to the running of the meeting would be to continue to > keep items of business sequentially separate and announce each new item > on the LLG members list as the meeting comes to it. I appreciate that > that's an extra chore for the chair, but it would be a bit of a boon for > at least me and, I imagine, others. I haven't checked, but are there in fact any such non-Lojban business items on the agenda posted in the links channel? If so, then having karis announce to the mailing list when any of those are taken up should meet your needs. If she doesn't reply to this thread in a timely manner, I will endeavor to remind her of this and/or post something myself here. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members