Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7Mux-0004bj-VT for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 09:53:31 -0700 Received: from dignity.sammycruisers.com ([160.238.47.42]:57853) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7Muv-0004Zm-Gk for lojban@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 09:53:31 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=zcizd; d=sammycruisers.com; h=Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Reply-To:To:From:Content-Type:Date; i=fivenight.cruise@sammycruisers.com; bh=4BGyYaiNYr2/NIdhn0UE7wl3oeM=; b=KOG/Y4B3ASGi4i4gPq49waBHf+b+UNkqpi/kF4GxE9dEVs7IR4R1x6YDxBwUFe8f8rkoqsakG+6V xWdq6Qj9BofVlJ54FWNMDwHrtZWiOyZTRJgDDyX9zYSVomieWMrNskDbgZib8UVjO44W9dNeTUDr t0btsctPiuKF6vjWzmk= Subject: =?UTF-8?B?NSBuaWdodCBjcnVpc2UgcGFja2FnZSB8IEhhd2FpaSB8IENhcmliYmVhbiB8IEV1cm9wZQ==?= Message-ID: <76565730.HRjlDwCbzcVmDP3IMbOKnHF@[hdm}> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: fivenight.cruise@sammycruisers.com To: lojban@lojban.org From: FiveNight Cruise Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Part1-___" Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:55:56 -0400 X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_bar: -- --Part1-___ Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit http://www.sammycruisers.com/main.html/bXk0sn9 Thanks for the catch, fixed. As for your question, I do not believe that would significantly affect the conclusion, no. For the most part, religious wars already are wars sold to the populace / armies / foreign states using religious justifications, rather than being genuinely motivated by religion. That's the point being hinted at regarding Laud [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Luard] - if the wars really weren't about territory, why did religious conflict fight over territories? Without being unduly cynical, the line between religious wars, and non-religious wars justified by religion is very thin. [http://www.sammycruisers.com/main.html/bXk0sn9] I don't want to talk anymore. [http://ww1.sammycruisers.com/index.html/yFrpYqqKqofMtdY] Mason &Jenner &Paulson DigitalExpress 1.5.1.7 Wildrose.BelevidereIL.61008. --Part1-___ Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 
 
 
 
Thanks for the catch, fixed. As for your question, I do not believe that would significantly affect the conclusion, no. For the most part, religious wars already are wars sold to the populace / armies / foreign states using religious justifications, rather than being genuinely motivated by religion. That's the point being hinted at regarding Laud - if the wars really weren't about territory, why did religious conflict fight over territories? Without being unduly cynical, the line between religious wars, and non-religious wars justified by religion is very thin.
 
 
 
  I don't want to talk anymore.
Mason &Jenner &Paulson DigitalExpress
1.5.1.7 Wildrose.Belevidere IL.61008.
  
--Part1-___--