Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jj6QC-0005yd-OP for lojban-newreal@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:30:00 -0700 Received: from [45.35.104.124] (port=18363 helo=mallard.earthquakeauthotity.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jj6Q9-0005xT-Bz for lojban@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:30:00 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=w05oqyiy; d=earthquakeauthotity.com; h=Message-ID:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date; i=wpg.healthwellness@earthquakeauthotity.com; bh=FTFJKP7tPD7ypijuPbW7DkTlSBc=; b=cUtOcAjAUxqN8w5FAwH7f35Vl2ZEAw2QfB05DmMHo7jounTXrxuYr6wAayY56V/y8Z62W1CT9qEq RagSvFo9N3T9l+cH0ZbrT9o+SjCSDG1beUc4Vx9rPtR08CvLvdrbkGpsNnTSmtUZiHNOo/tXe6vC WH+bnUNkCsIkGCctYhY= Message-ID: From: WPG HealthWellness Reply-To: wpg.healthwellness@earthquakeauthotity.com Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmVvcGVuaW5nIHBoYXNlIDEgLSBUZW1wYXR1cmUgY2hlY2sgZ3VpZGVsaW5lcw==?= To: lojban@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----t+{===_F7/2D-06710-92EWS80RC" Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:29:57 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Re: Reference Ticket Ref: plTR6Zuhf934984-1EShuvYgi9 =================--========================= This is a update to the status report from the 5th. Let them know about the rest and that is OK. Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: stackoverflow.com] -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0507] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: earthquakeauthotity.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image --_----t+{===_F7/2D-06710-92EWS80RC Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Re: Reference Ticket Ref: plTR6Zuhf934984-1EShuvYgi9 =================--========================= This is a update to the status report from the 5th. Let them know about the rest and that is OK. mea si nu a zis niciodat? niciun cuv?nt, tot de ru?ine. =================--========================= Water http://www.earthquakeauthotity.com/pages/00010953221/june-2020/index Updated Guidelines: Non-Contect Infared Thermometer. http://www.earthquakeauthotity.com/pages/00010953221/june-2020/index View Information http://rtp.earthquakeauthotity.com/info/8LsDXBTT/index/home =================--========================= page1 http://wbs.earthquakeauthotity.com/ =================--========================= much a majority-white, working cl area during the baby boom and up until the early 80s. the story then isn't unique to. mistook it then ?.. she wasn't 100% sure anyway how come 150? i guess because. post (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24389678/is-scientific-notation-safe-for-integer-constants-in-c) (since the morally best way to write such a number is clearly1e9). leftaroundabout (https://stackoverflow.com/users/745903/leftaroundabout) May 28 at 9:44 (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50559636/is-there-a-way-to-write-a-large-number-in-c-source-code-with-spaces-to-make-it#comment88137159_50559636) --_----t+{===_F7/2D-06710-92EWS80RC Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Reply: Support ticket ID: nn2uhpf77es6hva4py8vqm9oz

Re: Reference Ticket Ref: plTR6Zuhf934984-1EShuvYgi9 ========================================== This is a update to the status report from the 5th. Let them know about the rest and that is OK. mea si nu a zis niciodat? niciun cuv?nt, tot de ru?ine.

 

Updated Guidelines: Non-Contect Infared Thermometer.


View Information →

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 


 

much a majority-white, working cl area during the baby boom and up until the early 80s. the story then isn't unique to.

mistook it then ?.. she wasn't 100% sure anyway how come 150? i guess because.
 
 
 
 
--_----t+{===_F7/2D-06710-92EWS80RC--