Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:37:27 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
Message-ID: <20111116233727.GK2500@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: llg-members@lojban.org
References: <4E91CF8D.6080309@lojban.org>
 <20111031235307.GN8858@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <4EBD219C.6030802@lojban.org>
 <20111114105507.GR2500@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <4EC10DF5.9010002@lojban.org>
 <20111115030224.GW2500@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <4EC41B41.5020404@lojban.org>
 <20111116202539.GE29564@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111116202539.GE29564@mercury.ccil.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] 2011 Annual Meeting - Reports
Precedence: list
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 03:25:41PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Bob LeChevalier scripsit:
> 
> > That is what I meant by electronic formats.  I should have used
> > the more  precise "e-books".  (The question that pops into mind
> > is how we can  distinguish the two in Lojban, since both are
> > equally "books" and both  are equally "e". zo'o)
> 
> The x5 place of cukta does the job.

How?  I mean, how do you distinguish between them?

I guess just la'o, since we're talking about detailed format
information that doesn't flow smoothly without recourse to technical
names in *any* language.  So, nevermind; dumb question.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members