Why is it that the first one works but the second one doesn't? Is it something about order of operations, bool coercion to int, operator associativity, or an OBOE?

Kroger-Acct 7256370

Kroger Rewards

Giving More Back to your Community.

Today were giving back to help make your experience at Kroger more enjoyable.

We we like to extend our gratitude to you with a $50 Kroger Card to use as you wish.

Claim Today: Kroger.com: Rewards 7256370 →

Please redeem by Oct 14, 2014-- Thank you.

Commnuity-7456

Kroger.com:Your Community Rewards →

Krogeris committed to helping our communities grow and prosper. Year after year, local schools, churches and other nonprofit-organizations will earn points throughKroger Community Rewards.

You can locate your neighborhoof Kroger online. From- Dustin KKG Service Group| 152 Crouse St |Mansfield |OH. You can take yourself off the list https://www.kroger.com/storeLocatorher--/options

Why odd? If there is a string, then the result is going to be string as well. Easy to remember. It would be weird if result depended on the order of operands, I think

A member function may be defined (8.4) in its class definition, in which case it is an inline 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 function (7.1.2), or it may be defined outside of its class 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 if it has already been 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 but not defined in its class 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7.A 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 function definition that appears outside of the class definition shall appear in a namespace scope enclosing the 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 definition. Except for member function 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 that appear outside of a class definition, and except for explicit specializations of member functions of 49a0fbb26553bf052f068cc84f817bc7 templates and member function templates (14.7) appearing outside of the class definition, a member function shall not be redeclared..