Message-ID: <54B146BE.3030503@lojban.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:35:26 -0500
From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org>
Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
 running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", 
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: I have seen no motion regarding Robin's report on CLL
 republication.
 Could someone make a motion indicating 1) a vote of confidence in Robin's
 decision-making with respect to the process of CLL republication (CLL 1.1),
 including those items that he asked about 2) authorizing expenditures up
 to some maximum by Robin or his delegatees for such republication, without
 need for approval of each such expenditure, up to some specified limit (I
 suggest $1000 to $2000 based on Robin's report), with a final report of such
 expenditures submitted to the Board. [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
 [listed in lojban.org.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN] [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [68.230.241.214 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
Subject: [Llg-members] CLL republication - continuation of the meeting
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

I have seen no motion regarding Robin's report on CLL republication.

Could someone make a motion indicating
1) a vote of confidence in Robin's decision-making with respect to the 
process of CLL republication (CLL 1.1), including those items that he 
asked about
2) authorizing expenditures up to some maximum by Robin or his 
delegatees for such republication, without need for approval of each 
such expenditure, up to some specified limit (I suggest $1000 to $2000 
based on Robin's report), with a final report of such expenditures 
submitted to the Board.

Proceeding with the meeting.

Not to be included in such a motion, but worthy of discussion (after 
dealing with the motion), would be
1) if/how we want to advertise and/or promote the new release
2) whether the Lojban intro book needs to be amended or updated
3) whether we want to seek to publish Nick Nicholas/Robin Turner's 
textbook via Lightning Source, and whether it needs to be 
amended/updated (probably at least to include xorlo)
4) what will be the next step(s) following CLL 1.1, recognizing that 
Robin has indicated his intent to step down as jatna following that 
republication.  This implicitly includes deciding what (if any) will be 
the future of the byfy, which is clearly not working as intended in the 
motion that created it (there is no clear membership at this point and 
will soon be no leader)

Any/all of these topics are open for discussion at this time.

Depending on how much discussion is desired on the topic of CLL and the 
future of byfy, I will suggest that we set up a live discussion on IRC 
at some fixed time.  Because of the enormous range of time zones 
included in the membership, and the especial need to make sure Robin can 
participate, I am suggesting this live discussion take place on a 
Sunday.  I am proposing 18 January at 8am Pacific Time, which I think is 
3PM UT, and lasting for 2-3 hours maximum (if more is needed, additional 
discussions can be scheduled).  This may still not be good for Ali or 
Oz, but I think that any time good for them will inherently be bad for 
others.

Any motions which emerge from a live discussion will be decided as part 
of the regular order, via email, so as to make sure that no members are 
excluded from actual decisions.

Note that we are not waiting until such a discussion period - discussion 
of these topics can start immediately, but a live session may shorten 
the needed discussion time enormously because of real time response.

lojbab

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members