Received: from localhost ([::1]:43277 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YBoYb-0006zU-Bl; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:50:09 -0800 Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:51339) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YBoYX-0006zJ-TB for llg-members@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:50:07 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x12so16330830wgg.11 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:49:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Yu9rB2wWPqrd0fFQ9G9uxmX3UcmYVVy5zHsRWuCz+E=; b=rp8AhBfe6oCjf92RpCwcwAbZhj0TSezN/8MfoS8vDwskuVGjSndml28ZW0CZuC4hgN 7Z26ynCvPnjCWx3AYsFqYgdOEbZZ9ck4cYr4+fzqIeaSv9y0qvAKCnpZGIuP24coZdB8 38jujH0V4OUa5W9q5eiMyj7D6H3uxETqqBSPBQje3MY8Syd97e2Vbr2sHftrBgjUgq+o /Z4tqtQVBcEPzidH6Os/2mBDDDQX40p0qd5zPOOFkgn9auQpaUK2vkS97l8ApSTHGM6v gFmTAuuZsSWkzV1tKBu5vavjz1WKa13t946TtW5AbmUoIFq0vZqFHqQuqz7V4/Y9pvLk E/cA== X-Received: by 10.194.110.69 with SMTP id hy5mr20608837wjb.121.1421344198660; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (95-210-212-178.ip.skylogicnet.com. [95.210.212.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm23642035wic.10.2015.01.15.09.49.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:49:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B7FDB5.6030608@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:49:41 +0100 From: Ilmen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <54B146BE.3030503@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: <54B146BE.3030503@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.7 X-Spam_score_int: 7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On 10/01/2015 16:35, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > Depending on how much discussion is desired on the topic of CLL and > the future of byfy, I will suggest that we set up a live discussion on > IRC at some fixed time. Because of the enormous range of time zones > included in the membership, and the especial need to make sure Robin > can participate, I am suggesting this live discussion take place on a > Sunday. I am proposing 18 January at 8am Pacific Time, which I think > is 3PM UT, and lasting for 2-3 hours maximum (if more is needed, > additional discussions can be scheduled). This may still not be good > for Ali or Oz, but I think that any time good for them will inherently > be bad for others. > > Any motions which emerge from a live discussion will be decided as > part of the regular order, via email, so as to make sure that no > members are excluded from actual decisions. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [74.125.82.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ilmen.pokebip[at]gmail.com) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Subject: Re: [Llg-members] CLL republication - continuation of the meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 10/01/2015 16:35, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > Depending on how much discussion is desired on the topic of CLL and > the future of byfy, I will suggest that we set up a live discussion on > IRC at some fixed time. Because of the enormous range of time zones > included in the membership, and the especial need to make sure Robin > can participate, I am suggesting this live discussion take place on a > Sunday. I am proposing 18 January at 8am Pacific Time, which I think > is 3PM UT, and lasting for 2-3 hours maximum (if more is needed, > additional discussions can be scheduled). This may still not be good > for Ali or Oz, but I think that any time good for them will inherently > be bad for others. > > Any motions which emerge from a live discussion will be decided as > part of the regular order, via email, so as to make sure that no > members are excluded from actual decisions. If I'm not mistaken, 8am PST is 4pm UTC. This date is fine for me, I'll be attending. mu'o mi'e la .ilmen. _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members