Received: from localhost ([::1]:45815 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YJfjM-00016j-GW; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 02:01:44 -0800 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]:48710) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YJfjJ-00016Y-Ef for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 02:01:42 -0800 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k48so12636577wev.12 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 02:01:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=O7KlIeta0rLaNzLMqrhVY2wWgVFjcs1CUe5laMm8fQ4=; b=Sq+3iDwUfHy0KFOLXEG0rPJwPzmkuDo78mFcO3eeK/l21ZSRhMIvdLyCtXpWMwTKw5 ENpeEOw+9clKvtofoXW9ZrbA7FYmFhAn7IU6cu+KuB9msb4NjKTZ3hncHHGVq6PtSFZD cGQndfCkhyqNSNDyTXqpy2ZyT9+LCplLuZcYBk7C7Pf3iGjLAHJC+GQ6W6AKnLz8Z/i4 X4Oy/6GeQomso0bBvl92+1jIZ7AOlDbaE21zj3uECvhnYvVn3mwg3/2+nO7H2UHgugfg ZKGTSvUPbZfR/blPHJSZY0ZEI4A5jti+rxWcyyulNFINLwenaEdyvNY8iOMGtqa3wgaC esJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.61.65 with SMTP id n1mr5923378wjr.53.1423216894310; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 02:01:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.132.70 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 02:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.132.70 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 02:01:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D471BB.2070605@lojban.org> References: <54D471BB.2070605@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:01:33 +0000 Message-ID: From: And Rosta To: llg-members@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.7 X-Spam_score_int: 7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On 6 Feb 2015 07:48, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" < wrote: > it would be nice to hear from more of those members who have not spoken on the topic of the future of BPFK at the IRC discussion sections. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in gmail.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [74.125.82.181 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (and.rosta[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: BPFK Reauthorization X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8996643519665392550==" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org --===============8996643519665392550== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86d5746c8788050e6881d2 --047d7b86d5746c8788050e6881d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 6 Feb 2015 07:48, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" < lojbab@lojban.org> wrote: > it would be nice to hear from more of those members who have not spoken on the topic of the future of BPFK at the IRC discussion sections. I haven't managed to get a handle on the issues yet; but anyway, because my personal views tend to be extremist on this stuff (i.e. always pro radical reform), at this stage I'd rather just abstain so as to support whatever is the consensus. --And. --047d7b86d5746c8788050e6881d2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On 6 Feb 2015 07:48, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> it would be nice to hear from more of those members who have not spoken on the topic of the future of BPFK at the IRC discussion sections.

I haven't managed to get a handle on the issues yet; but anyway, because my personal views tend to be extremist on this stuff (i.e. always pro radical reform), at this stage I'd rather just abstain so as to support whatever is the consensus.

--And.

--047d7b86d5746c8788050e6881d2-- --===============8996643519665392550== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members --===============8996643519665392550==--