Received: from localhost ([::1]:48110 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <llg-members-bounces@lojban.org>)
	id 1YN8Kb-0003Lh-SC; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:10:29 -0800
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:44239)
 by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>)
 id 1YN8KW-0003LU-IQ
 for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:10:28 -0800
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id vb8so36832710obc.11
 for <llg-members@lojban.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:10:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=/wXsHttnt4SaGQ7/JTwnGxMDG0EfvVrKEzGQfLLYhjA=;
 b=E9YGbeOVft/VdNnagtzWyNlajLwyedx1/fSWL9JpOG2UTUqRZBL0M2cgoU67/9UKs+
 SwTRNCV5NHlXjjByy4D8eMtFbSFcVzOSwdi0m5abHD5KJ8CifwVByUGJOwUsEtMQRvhQ
 8dIOEuonn84cnHJnRAhep38mpYAZaRzZqNb/dEg20DUT5+aCJ3JfD4IWCEsWJxAtMD2Y
 ysXaalA1p+VlFPvYhtK16d9PSRHGjIejGNMIO+jxoVIPXiRIwirWPTdQuBxkF0GqGzTp
 UytoCiBenHxxlI2q/SiHQCZ72Ol8NOrJQN7oCLEot/Ujyu7g2PgcNuVDygq9Zfk3THOY
 ttVg==
X-Received: by 10.182.250.229 with SMTP id zf5mr13590348obc.16.1424041818288; 
 Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:10:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.90.71 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:09:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54E10141.1000202@selpahi.de>
References: <C37220F2-F066-4DED-9C2C-473F6BEF4968@gmail.com>
 <CAO7tK2fUviuhSZT_QpD-JPW1QtxPuhws340Q95AUxjcT3wEn+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP=UV6pN8iZVPk9bpPz6_28PDQddWyc2rrqzLHE6k831_G3bjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <F3E69666-53DE-4B92-BB81-4363668E4CDB@gmail.com> <54D471BB.2070605@lojban.org>
 <54D66BA8.5040607@lojban.org> <08041A2E-FC72-4E80-AAB4-468A1A3C4DB4@gmail.com>
 <54DA533B.2090803@lojban.org> <54DD2B86.2020506@lojban.org>
 <DC06A47A-7B20-4536-BC18-2A2AD1B4A60E@gmail.com> <54E10141.1000202@selpahi.de>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:09:58 +0900
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJPeEFebnQTvMNELbwC6SdNO8LmvAOpNpYxC0c54qPQw3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment)
X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-members.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-members/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-members@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members>,
 <mailto:llg-members-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8492847151131350488=="
Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org

--===============8492847151131350488==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2b9a6b97876050f2892c9

--001a11c2b9a6b97876050f2892c9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2015-02-16 5:27 GMT+09:00 selpahi <selpahi@selpahi.de>:

> I agree that the chair shouldn't be the one appointing members. Similarly,
> we don't want LLG to appoint the chair every year, but we (the LLG) have to
> pick a chair for the first year to get things started.
>
> So what if we did the same for the initial set of BPFK members? Let
> everyone who wants to be a member say so now, and then the LLG membership
> will hold a vote of confidence to approve that initial set of members. And
> from then on, it's up to the BPFK membership (including the chair) to
> decide how it wants to run things. This seems like a simple solution to me.
>
>
I agree, and want to be a member of the initial set of BPFK. mi'e la
guskant

--001a11c2b9a6b97876050f2892c9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">2015-02-16 5:27 GMT+09:00 selpahi <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mail=
to:selpahi@selpahi.de" target=3D"_blank">selpahi@selpahi.de</a>&gt;</span>:=
<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I agree that the chair shouldn&#39;t be =
the one appointing members. Similarly, we don&#39;t want LLG to appoint the=
 chair every year, but we (the LLG) have to pick a chair for the first year=
 to get things started.<br>
<br>
So what if we did the same for the initial set of BPFK members? Let everyon=
e who wants to be a member say so now, and then the LLG membership will hol=
d a vote of confidence to approve that initial set of members. And from the=
n on, it&#39;s up to the BPFK membership (including the chair) to decide ho=
w it wants to run things. This seems like a simple solution to me.<br><br><=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree, and want to be a member of the ini=
tial set of BPFK. mi&#39;e la guskant=C2=A0</div></div><br></div></div>

--001a11c2b9a6b97876050f2892c9--


--===============8492847151131350488==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Llg-members mailing list
Llg-members@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members

--===============8492847151131350488==--