Received: from localhost ([::1]:55853 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YO6f5-0007Ys-N5; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:35:39 -0800 Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net ([68.230.241.213]:57918) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YO6ey-0007Yl-FJ for llg-members@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:35:37 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo210 ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150218153526.YKYM18129.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo210> for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:35:26 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo210 with cox id trbR1p00N1LDWBL01rbRnK; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:35:26 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.54E4B13E.001C,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=aZC/a2Ut c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=4Y1Az08UtVsA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=__gC7Zfld-wZmII__0sA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <54E4B13E.5090904@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:35:26 -0500 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <5A14A249-2461-4CA7-8CBA-4E27840BB4F3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Fwd: Motion: BPFK Reauthorization (amendment) X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 2/17/2015 8:12 PM, selpahi wrote: > So how about a vote, since nobody is voicing any objections? This > meeting really needs to move on. Actually, I think no one has said anything at all since Riley revised his motion. I don't know if that is approval or not; several times in this meeting, things went silent for a couple of days and then someone finally spoke up (including the first iteration of Riley's proposal, I think). The revision needs a second, and then if there is no discussion/objection within a day or so of the second, I can take your comment as calling the question. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members