Received: from localhost ([::1]:44357 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Yd058-0004fP-QC; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:36:06 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net ([68.230.241.214]:45891) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Yd050-0004fG-TC for llg-members@lojban.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:36:03 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150331173552.IFGQ21735.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:35:52 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.63]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id AHbs1q0011Nn1eG01Hbswl; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:35:52 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.551ADAF8.00FA,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H/cFNZki c=1 sm=1 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:17 a=f3V2rFgbO5kA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=FnvARz_-IKRr_LJh3pMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <551ADB0C.7000605@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:36:12 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <5502321A.2050208@lojban.org> <550C19BE.90606@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] New Business: other topics X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 3/20/2015 9:48 AM, Ali Sajid Imami wrote: > So I'll reiterate my proposal as a motion now. I move that we create a > "Project Manager" post, which should be paid as well. Said person should > be in charge of coordinating all the efforts that we have ongoing. I have not seen any second for this motion, and no one seems interested in discussing it, though it had a good thread back at the beginning of the meeting. I certainly did not intend to squelch discussion completely by noting that we might have difficulty figuring out how to employ someone, merely to note that it should be a consideration. If there is no discussion, it can be passed to the Board for consideration, if any Board members are interested. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members