Received: from localhost ([::1]:49069 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YggKY-0003rh-Su; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:19:14 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net ([68.230.241.217]:40271) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YggKV-0003rW-Ol for llg-members@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:19:13 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo110 ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150410211905.SUYZ20038.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo110> for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:19:05 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.63]) by eastrmimpo110 with cox id EMK41q00K1Nn1eG01MK4KH; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:19:05 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.55283E49.01FA,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=a+/uAzuF c=1 sm=1 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:17 a=JJ1bDv3c7YsA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=7eY3LiplrKVzcR7sYQoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=OsVzNJO11dLSjsbb:21 a=K-1SUXFoM1ZAiQ87:21 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <55283E5E.9030201@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:19:26 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Detailed Proposal of a Project Manager X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 4/10/2015 3:06 PM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > To clarify: I'm waiting for an opinion from Lojbab. I won't vote until > Lojbab says anything on this topic. I don't think that there has been a second on Ali's motion yet, and the motion itself doesn't call for a specific expenditure (though that could be left to the Board post-meeting). There is no especially guarantee that I will still be in a position of authority after the new Board elects officers. I provided some input on your prior message, but I am not sure what else you might be looking for from me in the opinion department. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members