Received: from localhost ([::1]:58936 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6ZW8-0001Vn-0N; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 00:18:12 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net ([68.230.241.218]:40552) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6ZVz-0001VT-FL for llg-members@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 00:18:09 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150621071757.QXTE786.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:17:57 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.63]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id ivHx1q0021Nn1eG01vHxvp; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:17:57 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.55866525.004F,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=PZchcFdd c=1 sm=1 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:17 a=FvAEXBeo5g4A:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=JzIz-MWxg2mPa1M2m0cA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=CXkgoI4idhq8y1Tx:21 a=Y959-3qBMpvnAvZt:21 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Message-ID: <55866537.8030409@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:18:15 -0400 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-members@lojban.org References: <55858B42.7050005@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [Llg-members] Draft minutes of 2014 meeting X-BeenThere: llg-members@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-members@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-members-bounces@lojban.org On 6/20/2015 10:52 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > Thanks for doing this. I read through the page and fixed a minor typo. > One thing I noticed is that in the sections about elections, members are > named by their legal names. In some later sections, they are named by > their IRC/email usernames. (Personally, I prefer the usernames because I > recognize them!) Either way, I think they should either be consistent, > or when the members are listed, it should say "Alex Burka (aka la > durka)" etc. For the roll call, we need legal names (and ideally language/nationality) since the minutes are a legal record requirement, and someone looking at the minutes years from now likely won't know the usernames. I don't think that there would be a problem using aka identified usernames thereafter. lojbab _______________________________________________ Llg-members mailing list Llg-members@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members